Text vs. French Language Training for Special Purposes

被引:0
|
作者
Gajewska, Elzbieta [1 ]
Sowa, Magdalena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pedag Cracovie, Fac Sci Humaines, Krakow, Poland
[2] Univ Mar Curie Sklodowska, Chaire Linguist Appliquee, Lublin, Poland
来源
关键词
philology; curriculum; teaching language for professional purposes; text; specialized text;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
The study of philology (including Romance studies) has opened up very widely to specialized communication, introducing LSP classes into the curricula. The basis of language content programming for professional purposes is essentially a text (specialized text). Despite its many definitions, it is necessary, first of all, to pay attention to those that treat the text as a material manifestation of discourse and genre, and use it to conduct an analysis of the communicative and linguistic needs of learners. This article discusses the problem of the (in)presence of specialized text in philological education preparing for professional activity. Based on the analysis of philological study programs in Poland, it can be seen that they use text to varying degrees and extents in the teaching of various LSP. Text is certainly part of the names of the subjects (especially translation classes), but to a small extent it is possible to notice its presence in the analysis of needs and conceptualization of content in terms of communicative practices in the target work environment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Structure vs. use in heritage language
    Polinsky, Maria
    LINGUISTICS VANGUARD, 2016, 2 (01):
  • [42] Acquiring a language vs. inducing a grammar
    Dupre, Gabe
    COGNITION, 2024, 247
  • [43] Persuasion of the Undecided: Language vs. the Listener
    Longpre, Liane
    Durmus, Esin
    Cardie, Claire
    6TH WORKSHOP ON ARGUMENT MINING (ARGMINING 2019), 2019, : 167 - 176
  • [44] Comprehension vs. production in language acquisition
    Prat-Sala, Merce
    Hahn, Ulrike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 621 - 621
  • [45] TRAINING SPECIFICITY OF HURDLE VS. COUNTERMOVEMENT JUMP TRAINING
    Cappa, Dario F.
    Behm, David G.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (10) : 2715 - 2720
  • [46] Training control in hypertrophy training Intensity vs. repetition
    Fröhlich, M
    Schmidtbleicher, D
    Emrich, E
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPORTMEDIZIN, 2002, 53 (03): : 79 - 83
  • [47] Panel discussion: language awareness vs. folk linguistics vs. applied linguistics
    Stegu, Martin
    Preston, Dennis R.
    Wilton, Antje
    Finkbeiner, Claudia
    LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2018, 27 (1-2) : 186 - 196
  • [48] Perception of concatenative vs. neural text-to-speech (TTS): Differences in intelligibility in noise and language attitudes
    Cohn, Michelle
    Zellou, Georgia
    INTERSPEECH 2020, 2020, : 1733 - 1737
  • [49] RUSSIAN AS THE SECOND LANGUAGE: TEACHING BEGINNERS MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY AND LANGUAGE FOR SPECIAL PURPOSES
    Perfilieva, N.
    Galankina, I.
    Novospasskaya, N.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 2392 - 2397
  • [50] Sprint vs. interval training in football
    Bravo, D. Ferrari
    Impellizzeri, F. M.
    Rampinini, E.
    Castagna, C.
    Bishop, D.
    Wisloff, U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 29 (08) : 668 - 674