Solidarity with everyone? Intergroup helping and COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Yemane, Ruta [1 ]
Arnu, Hannah [1 ]
Aithal, Lara [1 ]
Rees, Jonas [2 ]
Veit, Susanne [1 ]
Woelfer, Ralf [3 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Zent Integrat & Migrat Forsch DeZIM, Berlin, Germany
[2] Inst Interdisziplinare Konflikt & Gewaltforsch IK, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Hsch Bundes Offentl Verwaltung, Berlin, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; empathy; field experiment; intergroup helping behaviour; prosocial behaviour; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1002/casp.2714
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates peoples' prosocial attitudes and real-life prosocial behaviour towards different ethnic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic, taking Germany as an empirical example. In a preregistered multi-study design, we examined: (a) who receives help, (b) who helps and (c) what explains prosocial behaviour. In study 1, we conducted a large-scale, nation-wide field experiment (1,980 help requests across 11 cities, resulting in 769 help offers in response). In study 2, we conducted an online survey with a general population sample (N = 1,033, M-age = 40 years, 43% females). Tests of proportions revealed high levels of prosocial attitudes as well as behaviour, favouring the ethnic ingroup (study 1), while regression analysis highlights the importance of empathy, compared to other theoretical predictors, for explaining prosocial behaviour (study 2). Findings underscore the relevance of ethnic boundaries during the pandemic crisis: Ethnic minority members benefit less from solidarity than ethnic majority members. However, we observe an attitude-behaviour gap between field experimental and survey data, indicating the importance of observational studies when studying prosocial behaviour during the pandemic. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1326
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immigrant Solidarity Amid the COVID-19 Crisis in Italy: Forms of Help, Intergroup Solidarity, and Recognition
    Artero, Maurizio
    Ambrosini, Maurizio
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2024,
  • [2] Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19?
    Tomasini, Floris
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2021, 30 (02) : 234 - 247
  • [3] Confront with solidarity COVID-19
    Porreca, Wladimir
    [J]. ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINA, 2021, 21 (01): : 285 - 299
  • [4] COVID-19 and the possibility of solidarity
    Chadwick, Ruth
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2020, 34 (07) : 637 - 637
  • [5] COVID-19 solidarity fund
    不详
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2020, 98 (04) : 233 - 233
  • [6] Social solidarity in the COVID-19 pandemic
    Bomtempo, Eugenio Morais
    Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli
    [J]. A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL, 2022, 22 (89): : 251 - 276
  • [7] Solidarity and collectivism in the context of COVID-19
    Flynn, Angela, V
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2022, 29 (05) : 1198 - 1208
  • [8] COVID-19 in Africa: a lesson in solidarity
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 2021, 398 (10296): : 185 - 185
  • [9] Relational Solidarity and the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Ho, Anita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS, 2022, 15 (01): : 117 - 118
  • [10] Cuba: Solidarity, Ebola and COVID-19
    Escobedo, Angel A.
    Auza-Santivanez, Cristians
    Rumbaut, Raisa
    Bonati, Maurizio
    Choonara, Imti
    [J]. BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2021, 5 (01)