Solidarity with everyone? Intergroup helping and COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Yemane, Ruta [1 ]
Arnu, Hannah [1 ]
Aithal, Lara [1 ]
Rees, Jonas [2 ]
Veit, Susanne [1 ]
Woelfer, Ralf [3 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Zent Integrat & Migrat Forsch DeZIM, Berlin, Germany
[2] Inst Interdisziplinare Konflikt & Gewaltforsch IK, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Hsch Bundes Offentl Verwaltung, Berlin, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; empathy; field experiment; intergroup helping behaviour; prosocial behaviour; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1002/casp.2714
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates peoples' prosocial attitudes and real-life prosocial behaviour towards different ethnic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic, taking Germany as an empirical example. In a preregistered multi-study design, we examined: (a) who receives help, (b) who helps and (c) what explains prosocial behaviour. In study 1, we conducted a large-scale, nation-wide field experiment (1,980 help requests across 11 cities, resulting in 769 help offers in response). In study 2, we conducted an online survey with a general population sample (N = 1,033, M-age = 40 years, 43% females). Tests of proportions revealed high levels of prosocial attitudes as well as behaviour, favouring the ethnic ingroup (study 1), while regression analysis highlights the importance of empathy, compared to other theoretical predictors, for explaining prosocial behaviour (study 2). Findings underscore the relevance of ethnic boundaries during the pandemic crisis: Ethnic minority members benefit less from solidarity than ethnic majority members. However, we observe an attitude-behaviour gap between field experimental and survey data, indicating the importance of observational studies when studying prosocial behaviour during the pandemic. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1326
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines: A blanket rule for everyone?
    Thorne, C. J.
    Ainsworth, M.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2020, 153 : 217 - 218
  • [32] COVID-19: Speed, co-operation and solidarity
    Moller, Alma D.
    [J]. LAEKNABLADID, 2020, 106 (06): : 289 - 289
  • [33] Solidarity as a companion virtue in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Galang, Joseph Renus F.
    Gopez, Jose Ma W.
    Capulong, Harvey Gain M.
    Gozum, Ivan Efreaim A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (02) : E315 - E316
  • [34] COVID-19, Asylum in the EU, and the Great Expectations of Solidarity
    Tsourdi, Evangelia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFUGEE LAW, 2020, 32 (02) : 374 - 380
  • [35] Solidarity, Afro-communitarianism, and COVID-19 vaccination
    Ewuoso, Cornelius
    Obengo, Tom
    Atuire, Caesar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 12
  • [36] Spaces of Solidarity and Spaces of Exception at the times of Covid-19
    Triandafyllidou, Anna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2020, 58 (03) : 261 - 263
  • [37] Global Solidarity is Necessary to End the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Kayo, Takuma
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC REVIEW, 2020, 27 (02) : 46 - 56
  • [38] Complicating solidarity The Hong Kong Covid-19 landscape
    Theng, Andre Joseph
    Tse, Vincent Wai Sum
    Wu, Jasper Zhao Zhen
    [J]. LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 8 (2-3): : 264 - 280
  • [39] VIRTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD SOLIDARITY NETWORKS FACING COVID-19
    Gonzalez-Tanco, Eva
    [J]. OBETS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2021, 16 (02): : 315 - 329
  • [40] Navigating COVID-19 in higher education: the significance of solidarity
    Mose, Lena
    [J]. COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 2020, 69 (04) : 532 - 533