Solidarity with everyone? Intergroup helping and COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Yemane, Ruta [1 ]
Arnu, Hannah [1 ]
Aithal, Lara [1 ]
Rees, Jonas [2 ]
Veit, Susanne [1 ]
Woelfer, Ralf [3 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Zent Integrat & Migrat Forsch DeZIM, Berlin, Germany
[2] Inst Interdisziplinare Konflikt & Gewaltforsch IK, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Hsch Bundes Offentl Verwaltung, Berlin, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; empathy; field experiment; intergroup helping behaviour; prosocial behaviour; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1002/casp.2714
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates peoples' prosocial attitudes and real-life prosocial behaviour towards different ethnic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic, taking Germany as an empirical example. In a preregistered multi-study design, we examined: (a) who receives help, (b) who helps and (c) what explains prosocial behaviour. In study 1, we conducted a large-scale, nation-wide field experiment (1,980 help requests across 11 cities, resulting in 769 help offers in response). In study 2, we conducted an online survey with a general population sample (N = 1,033, M-age = 40 years, 43% females). Tests of proportions revealed high levels of prosocial attitudes as well as behaviour, favouring the ethnic ingroup (study 1), while regression analysis highlights the importance of empathy, compared to other theoretical predictors, for explaining prosocial behaviour (study 2). Findings underscore the relevance of ethnic boundaries during the pandemic crisis: Ethnic minority members benefit less from solidarity than ethnic majority members. However, we observe an attitude-behaviour gap between field experimental and survey data, indicating the importance of observational studies when studying prosocial behaviour during the pandemic. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1326
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The US COVID-19 crises: facts, science and solidarity
    Cipriano, Pamela F.
    Boston-Leary, Katie
    Mcmillan, Kendra
    Peterson, Cheryl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2020, 67 (04) : 437 - 444
  • [42] Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19: Refugee Experiences in Brazil
    Martuscelli, Patricia Nabuco
    [J]. REFUGE, 2022, 38 (01) : 27 - 42
  • [43] Editorial: COVID-19 AND THE CRY OF THE POOR Sensitivity and Solidarity
    Nandhikkara, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DHARMA, 2020, 45 (02): : 161 - 166
  • [44] Solidarity and universal preparedness for health after covid-19
    Tomson, Goran
    Causevic, Sara
    Ottersen, Ole Petter
    Peterson, Stefan Swartling
    Rashid, Sabina
    Wanyenze, Rhoda Kitti
    Yamin, Alicia Ely
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [45] A Macromarketing Prescription for Covid-19: Solidarity and Care Ethics
    Shabbir, Haseeb A.
    Hyman, Michael R.
    Kostyk, Alena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROMARKETING, 2021, 41 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [46] Building solidarity during COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS
    Montess, Michael
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2024, 38 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [47] The Pandemic of Hate is Giving COVID-19 a Helping Hand
    Ng, Edmond
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2020, 102 (06): : 1158 - 1159
  • [48] Helping protect your practice against COVID-19
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2020, 229 (07) : 493 - 493
  • [49] Traumatization in medical staff helping with COVID-19 control
    Joob, Beuy
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2020, 87 : 10 - 10
  • [50] How Data is Helping to Fight COVID-19 Pandemic
    Athavale, Harsh Arvind
    Athavale, Sunita Arvind
    Pathak, Amey Subodh
    Pathak, Tanmay Subodh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (09) : LE01 - LE05