Uncertainty of site period on the variability of the site period-based ground motion prediction equations

被引:0
|
作者
Hou, Ruibin [1 ]
Wang, Jinmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ground -motion prediction equation; Variability; Site period; Engineering bedrock; Horizontal -to -vertical spectral ratio; EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA; SUBDUCTION INTERFACE EARTHQUAKES; NONINVASIVE METHODS; FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; EFFECTS MODEL; SURFACE-WAVE; JAPAN; VS30; FREQUENCY; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108345
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Site period has been widely acknowledged to be a reasonable site parameter for ground-motion modeling and site effect modeling. Its value could be analytically calculated using the shear-wave velocity (VS) profile by assuming that soil layers overlie a rigid bedrock, or empirically estimated from the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR). In this study, we tested the uncertainty of site period on the variability of the site period-based groundmotion prediction equations (GMPEs). The ground-motion records and site data in Japan were used. We first used different VS values as engineering bedrock to derive a set of analytical site periods, and tested the uncertainty because of the bedrock VS selection on the GMPE variability. The results show that adding information about the stiff-soil or soft-rock layer beneath the surface soft-soil layers would significantly improve site effect prediction accuracy. An engineering bedrock with VS equal to about 800 m/s is recommended. We then tested the uncertainty of site period because of the choice between the analytical one and the empirical one on the GMPE variability. The empirical site period is better than the analytical site period at spectral periods from 0.06s to 0.4s. At spectral periods longer than 0.4s, the empirical site period produces larger variability than the analytical one using VS >= 800 m/s bedrock and has a better performance than that using VS < 600 m/s bedrock. The larger variability is partly contributed by the uncertainty in identifying site period value from the HVSR curve. Using the site period from the first peak of the HVSR curve generally produces a smaller variability than that from the highest peak. For sites with more than one comparable peak in the HVSR curve, the site period from the first peak is recommended. For the regions out of Japan, cautions may be paid for these recommendations because of the potential region dependence of site response.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variation of Source-to-Site Distance for Megathrust Subduction Earthquakes: Effects on Ground Motion Prediction Equations
    Goda, Katsuichiro
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (02) : 845 - 866
  • [42] Influence of site response and focal mechanism on the performance of peak ground motion prediction equations for the Greek region
    Del Gaudio, Vincenzo
    Pierri, Pierpaolo
    Chousianitis, Konstantinos
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 125
  • [43] EVALUATING THE SCHEMES OF ENGINEERING SITE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON RESIDUAL ANALYSIS OF GROUND MOTION PREDICTION
    Liu Y.
    Ren Y.-F.
    Wang D.-R.
    Wang H.-W.
    Ji K.
    Wen R.-Z.
    Zhou B.-F.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40 (06): : 99 - 109
  • [44] Prediction of peak ground motion for on-site earthquake early warning based on SVM
    Yu, Cong
    Song, Jindong
    Li, Shanyou
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40 (03): : 63 - 72
  • [45] Long-Period Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Moment Magnitude Estimation of Large Earthquakes in Japan
    Ibrahim, Rami
    Si, Hongjun
    Koketsu, Kazuki
    Miyake, Hiroe
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (01) : 54 - 72
  • [46] Return period of recorded ground motion
    Malhotra, Praveen K.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (06) : 833 - 839
  • [47] Seismic site classification of the Costa Rican Strong-Motion Network based on VS30 measurements and site fundamental period
    Pinzon, Luis A.
    Hidalgo Leiva, Diego A.
    Moya-Fernandez, Aaron
    Schmidt-Diaz, Victor
    Pujades, Luis G.
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2021, 25 (04) : 383 - 389
  • [48] Duration of strong ground motion during Mexican earthquakes in terms of magnitude, distance to the rupture area and dominant site period
    Reinoso, E
    Ordaz, M
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (05): : 653 - 673
  • [49] Spectral Ground Motion Intensity Based on Capacity and Period Elongation
    Kadas, Koray
    Yakut, Ahmet
    Kazaz, Ilker
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (03) : 401 - 409
  • [50] Site response analysis considering strain compatible site period
    Hayati, Hoss
    Moss, Robb E. S.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 92 : 551 - 560