Uncertainty of site period on the variability of the site period-based ground motion prediction equations

被引:0
|
作者
Hou, Ruibin [1 ]
Wang, Jinmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ground -motion prediction equation; Variability; Site period; Engineering bedrock; Horizontal -to -vertical spectral ratio; EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA; SUBDUCTION INTERFACE EARTHQUAKES; NONINVASIVE METHODS; FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; EFFECTS MODEL; SURFACE-WAVE; JAPAN; VS30; FREQUENCY; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108345
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Site period has been widely acknowledged to be a reasonable site parameter for ground-motion modeling and site effect modeling. Its value could be analytically calculated using the shear-wave velocity (VS) profile by assuming that soil layers overlie a rigid bedrock, or empirically estimated from the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR). In this study, we tested the uncertainty of site period on the variability of the site period-based groundmotion prediction equations (GMPEs). The ground-motion records and site data in Japan were used. We first used different VS values as engineering bedrock to derive a set of analytical site periods, and tested the uncertainty because of the bedrock VS selection on the GMPE variability. The results show that adding information about the stiff-soil or soft-rock layer beneath the surface soft-soil layers would significantly improve site effect prediction accuracy. An engineering bedrock with VS equal to about 800 m/s is recommended. We then tested the uncertainty of site period because of the choice between the analytical one and the empirical one on the GMPE variability. The empirical site period is better than the analytical site period at spectral periods from 0.06s to 0.4s. At spectral periods longer than 0.4s, the empirical site period produces larger variability than the analytical one using VS >= 800 m/s bedrock and has a better performance than that using VS < 600 m/s bedrock. The larger variability is partly contributed by the uncertainty in identifying site period value from the HVSR curve. Using the site period from the first peak of the HVSR curve generally produces a smaller variability than that from the highest peak. For sites with more than one comparable peak in the HVSR curve, the site period from the first peak is recommended. For the regions out of Japan, cautions may be paid for these recommendations because of the potential region dependence of site response.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TELEMETRY PARAMETER PERIOD-BASED ANOMALY DETECTION
    Li, Weizheng
    Meng, Qiao
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2013, PTS I-III, 2014, 150 : 201 - 208
  • [22] A simulation-based nonlinear site amplifi cation model for ground-motion prediction equations in Japan
    Ruibin Hou
    John Xingquan Zhao
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2021, 20 (04) : 843 - 862
  • [23] Site-term analysis and site-specific ground-motion parameters prediction based on strong motion data
    Chen, Longwei
    Chen, Yuxiang
    Yuan, Xiaoming
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52 (02): : 97 - 105
  • [24] Site response zones and short-period earthquake ground motion projections for the Las Vegas Basin
    Luke, Barbara
    Liu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2008, 117 (Suppl 2) : 757 - 772
  • [25] Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Vertical Component from Subduction Interface Earthquakes in Japan Using Site Classes as the Site Term
    Bai, Shihong
    Zhao, John X.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2022, 112 (03) : 1527 - 1548
  • [26] Site response zones and short-period earthquake ground motion projections for the Las Vegas Basin
    Barbara Luke
    Ying Liu
    Journal of Earth System Science, 2008, 117 : 757 - 772
  • [27] Nonlinear Site Models Derived from 1D Analyses for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Using Site Class as the Site Parameter
    Zhao, John X.
    Hu, Junsheng
    Jiang, Fei
    Zhou, Jun
    Zhang, Yingbin
    An, Xiaowen
    Lu, Ming
    Rhoades, David. A.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 105 (04) : 2010 - 2022
  • [28] Modeling and studying the impact of soil plasticity on the site amplification factor in ground motion prediction equations
    Kaveh Horri
    Mehdi Mousavi
    Mohamadreza Motahari
    Ali Farhadi
    Journal of Seismology, 2019, 23 : 1179 - 1200
  • [29] Site-dependent ground-motion prediction equations and uniform hazard response spectra
    Gao, Jia-Cian
    Chan, Chung-Han
    Lee, Chyi-Tyi
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2021, 292
  • [30] Modeling and studying the impact of soil plasticity on the site amplification factor in ground motion prediction equations
    Horri, Kaveh
    Mousavi, Mehdi
    Motahari, Mohamadreza
    Farhadi, Ali
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2019, 23 (06) : 1179 - 1200