Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Chuanzhi [1 ]
Yin, Guangming [1 ]
Jiang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Tan, Jing [1 ]
Huang, Kai [1 ]
Yuan, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, 138 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2023年 / 75卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kidney calculi; Urinary diversion; Nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; URINARY-DIVERSION; MANAGEMENT; UROLITHIASIS; MM; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Both mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are two major strategies for the endourological management of kidney stones. In the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit.METHODS: Patients with a history of bladder cancer and ileal conduit who had undergone mPNL or RIRS for unilateral kidney stones 10-20 mm in size between January 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between mPNL and RIRS. RESULTS: The failure rate of the initial surgery was 2.5% and 18.9% for mPNL and RIRS, respectively (P=0.025). In total, 39 and 30 patients were finally included in the mPNL and RIRS groups. One-session stone-free rate (SFR) was higher in the mPNL group than the RIRS group (97.4% vs. 66.7%, P=0.002). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to operation time, postoperative hospitalization, complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, as well as the change in hemoglobin, creatinine, procalcitonin, and pain Visual Analogue Scale Score before and after the surgery. Moreover, Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in patients stratified by years (2015-2018 and 2019-2022).CONCLUSIONS: Both mPNL and RIRS were feasible and safe for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. However, mPNL achieved superior SFR outcomes with a similar incidence of complications, and it might be a sensible alternative for selected patients.(Cite this article as: Zhou C, Yin G, Jiang Z, Tan J, Huang K, Yuan P. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:616-24. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6)
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 624
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A randomized comparative study of flexible ureterorenoscopy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones 2 cm or less
    Darwish, Amr E.
    Moneim, Alaa E. Abdel
    Ahmed, Abdelfatah I.
    Hamdy, Seif M.
    Abolella, Hassan A.
    Reda, Ahmed
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2024, 18 (04) : 273 - 277
  • [42] Ultramini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of 10–30 mm calculi: a randomized controlled trial
    Soumendra N. Datta
    Ramandeep S. Chalokia
    K. W. Wing
    K. Patel
    R. Solanki
    Janak Desai
    Urolithiasis, 2022, 50 : 361 - 367
  • [43] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of 2-3 cm Multicalyceal Kidney Stones
    Cakici, Mehmet Caglar
    Sari, Sercan
    Ozok, Hakki Ligur
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Hepsen, Emre
    Sagnak, Levent
    Topaloglu, Hikmet
    Ersoy, Hamit
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 5 (04): : 143 - 148
  • [44] Percutaneous-Based Management of Staghorn Calculi in Solitary Kidney: Combined Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
    Zhong, Wen
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Wang, Liang
    Swami, Sunil
    Zeng, Guohua
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (01) : 70 - 73
  • [45] A Comparative Study of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Staghorn Renal Calculi
    Xu, Xiang
    Liao, Sucai
    Wei, Genggeng
    Xu, Feihong
    Jiang, Yi
    Lu, Zhengquan
    Xiong, Lin
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2024, 95 (04) : 568 - 574
  • [46] FAVORABLE OUTCOMES OF CONTEMPORARY PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY VERSUS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF RENAL STONES IN ADULT PATIENTS: A COCHRANE REVIEW
    Soderberg, Leah
    Ding, Maylynn
    Pais, Vernon
    Borofsky, Michael S.
    Parker, Robin
    Dahm, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E751 - E752
  • [47] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
    Srisubat, Attasit
    Potisat, Somkiat
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Setthawong, Vasun
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (11):
  • [48] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Kidney Stones
    Schmidt, S.
    Miernik, A.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (09): : 1283 - 1286
  • [49] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
    Setthawong, Vasun
    Srisubat, Attasit
    Potisat, Somkiat
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Pattanittum, Porjai
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (08):
  • [50] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
    Srisubat, Attasit
    Potisat, Somkiat
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Setthawong, Vasun
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04):