Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Chuanzhi [1 ]
Yin, Guangming [1 ]
Jiang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Tan, Jing [1 ]
Huang, Kai [1 ]
Yuan, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, 138 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2023年 / 75卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kidney calculi; Urinary diversion; Nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; URINARY-DIVERSION; MANAGEMENT; UROLITHIASIS; MM; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Both mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are two major strategies for the endourological management of kidney stones. In the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit.METHODS: Patients with a history of bladder cancer and ileal conduit who had undergone mPNL or RIRS for unilateral kidney stones 10-20 mm in size between January 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between mPNL and RIRS. RESULTS: The failure rate of the initial surgery was 2.5% and 18.9% for mPNL and RIRS, respectively (P=0.025). In total, 39 and 30 patients were finally included in the mPNL and RIRS groups. One-session stone-free rate (SFR) was higher in the mPNL group than the RIRS group (97.4% vs. 66.7%, P=0.002). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to operation time, postoperative hospitalization, complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, as well as the change in hemoglobin, creatinine, procalcitonin, and pain Visual Analogue Scale Score before and after the surgery. Moreover, Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in patients stratified by years (2015-2018 and 2019-2022).CONCLUSIONS: Both mPNL and RIRS were feasible and safe for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. However, mPNL achieved superior SFR outcomes with a similar incidence of complications, and it might be a sensible alternative for selected patients.(Cite this article as: Zhou C, Yin G, Jiang Z, Tan J, Huang K, Yuan P. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:616-24. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6)
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 624
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience
    Yunjin Bai
    Xiaoming Wang
    Yubo Yang
    Ping Han
    Jia Wang
    BMC Urology, 17
  • [32] Comparison between tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 2 to 3cm renal lithiasis
    Lee, Ya-Che
    Jou, Yeong-Chin
    Cheng, Ming-Chin
    Shen, Cheng-Huang
    Lin, Chang-Te
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (03) : 152 - 156
  • [33] Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with significant comorbidities and solitary kidney
    Adanur, Senol
    Aydin, Hasan Riza
    Mohamed, Omar
    Fathi, Atef
    UROLITHIASIS, 2015, 43 (04) : 385 - 386
  • [34] Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with significant comorbidities and solitary kidney
    Senol Adanur
    Hasan Rıza Aydin
    Omar Mohamed
    Atef Fathi
    Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 : 385 - 386
  • [35] The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones
    Zhijian Zhao
    Shanfeng Yin
    Huacai Zhu
    Donglong Cheng
    Yongda Liu
    Guohua Zeng
    Urolithiasis, 2021, 49 : 167 - 172
  • [36] COMPARISON OF MINIATURIZED PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY: WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR 10-20 MM RENAL STONES IN CHILDREN?
    Ozcift, Burak
    Tiryaki, Huseyin Tugrul
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (07): : 643 - 650
  • [37] The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Yin, Shanfeng
    Zhu, Huacai
    Cheng, Donglong
    Liu, Yongda
    Zeng, Guohua
    UROLITHIASIS, 2021, 49 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [38] Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: A single-center experience
    Tsai, I-Chen
    Chen, Zhi-Hao
    Tseng, Wen-Hsin
    Su, Chia-Cheng
    Lee, Kau-Han
    Hsieh, Kun-Lin
    Lim, Chye-Yang
    Huang, Steven K.
    Chiu, Allen W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 59 - 60
  • [39] AMBULATORY TUBELESS MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (MINI-PCNL) VERSUS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) IN TREATMENT OF 1-2 CM LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
    Elmansy, Hazem
    Fathy, Moustafa
    Hodhod, Amr
    Alaref, Amer
    Nikoufar, Parsa
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Ahmad, Abdulrahman
    Hadi, Ruba Abdul
    Abbas, Loay
    Alaradi, Husain
    Shabana, Waleed
    Kotb, Ahmed
    Shahrour, Walid
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E818 - E818
  • [40] Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children
    Ergin, Giray
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kopru, Burak
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Kibar, Yusuf
    Biri, Hasan
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 (04) : 1121 - 1126