Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Chuanzhi [1 ]
Yin, Guangming [1 ]
Jiang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Tan, Jing [1 ]
Huang, Kai [1 ]
Yuan, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, 138 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2023年 / 75卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kidney calculi; Urinary diversion; Nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; URINARY-DIVERSION; MANAGEMENT; UROLITHIASIS; MM; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Both mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are two major strategies for the endourological management of kidney stones. In the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit.METHODS: Patients with a history of bladder cancer and ileal conduit who had undergone mPNL or RIRS for unilateral kidney stones 10-20 mm in size between January 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between mPNL and RIRS. RESULTS: The failure rate of the initial surgery was 2.5% and 18.9% for mPNL and RIRS, respectively (P=0.025). In total, 39 and 30 patients were finally included in the mPNL and RIRS groups. One-session stone-free rate (SFR) was higher in the mPNL group than the RIRS group (97.4% vs. 66.7%, P=0.002). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to operation time, postoperative hospitalization, complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, as well as the change in hemoglobin, creatinine, procalcitonin, and pain Visual Analogue Scale Score before and after the surgery. Moreover, Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in patients stratified by years (2015-2018 and 2019-2022).CONCLUSIONS: Both mPNL and RIRS were feasible and safe for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. However, mPNL achieved superior SFR outcomes with a similar incidence of complications, and it might be a sensible alternative for selected patients.(Cite this article as: Zhou C, Yin G, Jiang Z, Tan J, Huang K, Yuan P. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:616-24. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6)
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 624
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ULTRA MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY VERSUS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY IN THE TREATMENT OF 10-30MM CALCULI
    Datta, Soumendra
    Ng, Ka-Wing
    Solanki, Ronak
    Desai, Janak
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E405 - E406
  • [22] Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones
    Atis, Gokhan
    Culpan, Meftun
    Pelit, Eyup Sabri
    Canakci, Cengiz
    Ulusi, Ismail
    Gunaydin, Bilal
    Yildirim, Asif
    Caskurlu, Turban
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (02) : 2995 - 2999
  • [23] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children With Moderate-size Kidney Stones: Results of Multi-institutional Analysis
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Unsal, Ali
    Tepeler, Abdulkadir
    Atis, Gokhan
    Tokatli, Zafer
    Oztuna, Derya
    Armagan, Abdullah
    Gurbuz, Cenk
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    Saglam, Remzi
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 519 - 523
  • [24] Comparative Evaluation of Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Renal Stones 10-20 mm in Size
    Barut, Osman
    Kucukdurmaz, Faruk
    Demirkol, Mehmet Kutlu
    Demir, Bekir Turkay
    Sahinkanat, Tayfun
    Resim, Sefa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 26 (04): : 317 - 321
  • [25] Re: An Easy Risk Stratification to Recommend the Optimal Patients with 2-3 cm Kidney Stones to Receive Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01): : 26 - 27
  • [26] The safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal lithiasis in pelvic ectopic kidney: an exploratory pilot study
    Wu, Junfeng
    Shen, Jun
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [27] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower-Pole Renal Stones with a Diameter of 15 to 20 mm
    Bozkurt, Omer F.
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Yildiz, Yildiray
    Can, Ceren E.
    Unsal, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (07) : 1131 - 1135
  • [28] Comparative study of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of intermediate-sized kidney stones
    Ramon de Fata, F.
    Garcia-Tello, A.
    Andres, G.
    Redondo, C.
    Meilan, E.
    Gimbernat, H.
    Angulo, J. C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (09): : 576 - 583
  • [29] Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of lower pole renal stones
    Grisard, S.
    Franquet, Q.
    Garnier-Crussard, A.
    Poncet, D.
    Overs, C.
    Matillon, X.
    Long, J. A.
    Descotes, J. L.
    Badet, L.
    Abid, N.
    Fiard, G.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (02): : 77 - 84
  • [30] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience
    Bai, Yunjin
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Yang, Yubo
    Han, Ping
    Wang, Jia
    BMC Urology, 2017, 17