Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Chuanzhi [1 ]
Yin, Guangming [1 ]
Jiang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Tan, Jing [1 ]
Huang, Kai [1 ]
Yuan, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Urol, 138 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2023年 / 75卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kidney calculi; Urinary diversion; Nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; URINARY-DIVERSION; MANAGEMENT; UROLITHIASIS; MM; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Both mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are two major strategies for the endourological management of kidney stones. In the current study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mPNL and RIRS for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit.METHODS: Patients with a history of bladder cancer and ileal conduit who had undergone mPNL or RIRS for unilateral kidney stones 10-20 mm in size between January 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively included. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between mPNL and RIRS. RESULTS: The failure rate of the initial surgery was 2.5% and 18.9% for mPNL and RIRS, respectively (P=0.025). In total, 39 and 30 patients were finally included in the mPNL and RIRS groups. One-session stone-free rate (SFR) was higher in the mPNL group than the RIRS group (97.4% vs. 66.7%, P=0.002). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to operation time, postoperative hospitalization, complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, as well as the change in hemoglobin, creatinine, procalcitonin, and pain Visual Analogue Scale Score before and after the surgery. Moreover, Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in patients stratified by years (2015-2018 and 2019-2022).CONCLUSIONS: Both mPNL and RIRS were feasible and safe for the treatment of 10-20 mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit. However, mPNL achieved superior SFR outcomes with a similar incidence of complications, and it might be a sensible alternative for selected patients.(Cite this article as: Zhou C, Yin G, Jiang Z, Tan J, Huang K, Yuan P. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:616-24. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05394-6)
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 624
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10–20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    José D. Cabrera
    Braulio O. Manzo
    José E. Torres
    Fabio C. Vicentini
    Héctor M. Sánchez
    Ernesto A. Rojas
    Edgard Lozada
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2621 - 2628
  • [2] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cabrera, Jose D.
    Manzo, Braulio O.
    Torres, Jose E.
    Vicentini, Fabio C.
    Sanchez, Hector M.
    Rojas, Ernesto A.
    Lozada, Edgard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (10) : 2621 - 2628
  • [3] Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for ≤2 cm renal stones: A prospective study
    Galeti, E. H.
    Pogula, V. R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1484 - S1484
  • [4] Use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in pediatric kidney stones
    Mahmoud, Mahmoud Ahmed
    Shawki, Amir Samuel
    Abdallah, Hany Mostafa
    Mostafa, Diaa
    Elawady, Hossam
    Samir, Mohamed
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 3083 - 3089
  • [5] Use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in pediatric kidney stones
    Mahmoud Ahmed Mahmoud
    Amir Samuel Shawki
    Hany Mostafa Abdallah
    Diaa Mostafa
    Hossam Elawady
    Mohamed Samir
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 3083 - 3089
  • [6] Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Jeong Woo
    Park, Juhyun
    Lee, Seung Bae
    Son, Hwancheol
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Jeong, Hyeon
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (05) : 873 - 877
  • [7] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones in overweight or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiu, Ming
    Shi, Hongjin
    Yang, Fabin
    Li, Pingchu
    Fu, Shi
    Wang, Jiansong
    Wang, Haifeng
    Yang, Qiao
    Zuo, Yigang
    Hai, Bing
    Zhang, Jinsong
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [8] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods in Treatment of Upper Calyceal Stones of 10-20mm
    Selmi, Volkan
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Ozturk, Ufuk
    Tuygun, Can
    Goktug, Hasan Nedim Goksel
    Imamoglu, Muhammed Abdurrahim
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (12): : 1293 - 1298
  • [9] The Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of 10-25 mm Kidney Stones in Elderly Patients
    Ergin, Giray
    Kopru, Burak
    Kirac, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 8 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [10] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults
    Soderberga, Leah
    Erguna, Onuralp
    Ding, Maylynn
    Parker, Robin
    Borofsky, Michael S.
    Pais, Vernon
    Dahm, Philipp
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):