The Effect of Time Pressure on Human-Robot Interaction Performance during Excavator Teleoperation

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Jin Sol [1 ]
Ham, Youngjib [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In teleoperation, it is crucial to monitor human operators' cognitive workload. This is because the movement of the end-effector of the robot in a distance is ultimately determined by the decisions, controls, and commands of the human operators. There are various factors that affect cognitive load, and among them, time pressure or schedule pressure is the common stress that human workers usually experience in construction to meet the project completion deadline. They have to make up for it due to factors that delay the schedule during the construction project (e.g., weather, clients' change orders). It is hard to expect that there will not be time pressure even when teleoperating construction robots since it is known that teleoperation takes longer to accomplish the same amount of work as onboarding. Such time pressure typically affects human workers' cognitive load and work performance in various contexts. There is still a lack of knowledge about operators' perspective when it comes to teleoperating a robot for a challenging task at a construction site under time constraints. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the cognitive load of the operator and overall human-robot interaction performance with time pressure. This study takes account of different levels of time pressure at a construction site rather than a binary situation, that is, with or without time pressure. The experimental results showed that cognitive load increased and performance decreased when excessive time pressure was given, whereas cognitive load decreased and performance increased when reasonable time pressure was applied.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 512
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Human attitude during Human-Robot Interaction
    Sorrentino, A.
    Fiorini, L.
    Fabbricotti, I.
    Sancarlo, D.
    Ciccone, F.
    Cavallo, F.
    2020 29TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2020, : 195 - 200
  • [22] Anxiety detection during human-robot interaction
    Kulic, D
    Croft, E
    2005 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2005, : 389 - 394
  • [23] User Localization During Human-Robot Interaction
    Alonso-Martin, F.
    Gorostiza, Javi F.
    Malfaz, Maria
    Salichs, Miguel A.
    SENSORS, 2012, 12 (07) : 9913 - 9935
  • [24] A survey of communicating robot learning during human-robot interaction
    Habibian, Soheil
    Valdivia, Antonio Alvarez
    Blumenschein, Laura H.
    Losey, Dylan P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [25] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [26] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [27] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [28] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [29] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11
  • [30] Human-robot interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquère, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2012, 80 (STAR): : 123 - 172