Discretized solenoid design of a 1.5 T and a 3.0 T REBCO wholebody MRI magnets with cost comparison according to magnetic flux

被引:0
|
作者
Jung, Wonju [1 ]
Kim, Geonyoung [1 ]
Choi, Kibum [1 ]
Park, Hyunsoo [1 ]
Hahn, Seungyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS | 2023年 / 25卷 / 04期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
MRI magnet; MRI cost; REBCO;
D O I
10.9714/psac.2023.25.4.075
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rare earth barium copper oxide (REBCO) materials have shown the possibility of high-temperature superconductor (HTS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnets due to their elevated transition temperature. While numerous MRI magnet designs have emerged, there is a growing emphasis on estimating the cost before manufacturing. In this paper, we propose two designs of REBCO whole-body MRI magnets: (1) 1.5 T and (2) 3.0 T, the standard center field choices for hospital use, and compare their costs based on conductor usage. The basis topology of the design method is based on discretized solenoids to enhance field homogeneity. Magnetic stress calculation is done to further prove the mechanical feasibility of their construction. Multi-width winding technique and outer notch structure are used to improve critical current characteristic. We apply consistent constraints for current margins, sizes, and field homogeneities to ensure an equal cost comparison. A graph is plotted to show the cost increase with magnetic flux growth. Additionally, we compare our designs to two additional MRI magnet designs from other publications with respect to the cost and magnetic flux, and present the linear relationship between them.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carotid plaque morphology and composition: Initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths
    Underhill, Hunter R.
    Yarnykh, Vasily L.
    Hatsukami, Thomas S.
    Wang, Jinnan
    Balu, Niranjan
    Hayes, Cecil E.
    Oikawa, Minako
    Yu, Wei
    Xu, Dongxiang
    Chu, Baocheng
    Wyman, Bradley T.
    Polissar, Nayak L.
    Yuan, Chun
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (02) : 550 - 560
  • [42] The Application of Accurate Calculation of Magnetic Field Intensity in 1.5-T Superconducting MRI Magnet Design
    Feng, Zhongkui
    Li, Lankai
    Gao, Chunjie
    Zhu, Guang
    Li, Yi
    Li, Xian
    Dai, Yinming
    Wang, Qiuliang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2012, 22 (06)
  • [43] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [44] Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner, Maximilian K. M.
    Huebner, Frank
    Scholtz, Jan Erik
    Zangos, Stephan
    Schulz, Boris
    Luboldt, Wolfgang
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Bodelle, Boris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (08) : 1432 - 1438
  • [45] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T imaging for detection of focal malignant liver lesions
    Chang, JM
    Lee, JM
    Lee, MW
    Choi, JY
    Kim, SH
    Lee, JY
    Han, JK
    Choi, BI
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [46] Alteration of flux density of highly coercive SmCo magnets used in prosthodontics and epithetics in 1.5&x202f;T and 3&x202f;T MRI
    Buu-Tai Truong
    Blankenstein, Felix H.
    RADIOLOGE, 2019, 59 (10): : 912 - 919
  • [47] K-T sense-accelerated myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Schwitter, J.
    Kozerke, S.
    Maredia, N.
    Suerder, D.
    Greenwood, J. P.
    Boesiger, P.
    Plein, S.
    HEART, 2008, 94 : A82 - A83
  • [48] Assessment of Cardiac Iron Overload in Thalassemia With MRI on 3.0-T High-Field T1, T2, and T2*Quantitative Parametric Mapping in Comparison to T2*on 1.5-T
    Krittayaphong, Rungroj
    Zhang, Shuo
    Saiviroonporn, Pairash
    Viprakasit, Vip
    Tanapibunpon, Prajak
    Rerkudom, Boonying
    Yindeengam, Ahthit
    Wood, John C.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 12 (04) : 752 - 754
  • [49] MS: Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5T/3.0T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - Initial Experience
    Debatin, J
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (06): : 787 - 791
  • [50] Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
    Hata, Hirofumi
    Inoue, Yusuke
    Nakajima, Ai
    Komi, Shotaro
    Miyatake, Hiroki
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 16 (02) : 109 - 114