Discretized solenoid design of a 1.5 T and a 3.0 T REBCO wholebody MRI magnets with cost comparison according to magnetic flux

被引:0
|
作者
Jung, Wonju [1 ]
Kim, Geonyoung [1 ]
Choi, Kibum [1 ]
Park, Hyunsoo [1 ]
Hahn, Seungyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS | 2023年 / 25卷 / 04期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
MRI magnet; MRI cost; REBCO;
D O I
10.9714/psac.2023.25.4.075
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rare earth barium copper oxide (REBCO) materials have shown the possibility of high-temperature superconductor (HTS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnets due to their elevated transition temperature. While numerous MRI magnet designs have emerged, there is a growing emphasis on estimating the cost before manufacturing. In this paper, we propose two designs of REBCO whole-body MRI magnets: (1) 1.5 T and (2) 3.0 T, the standard center field choices for hospital use, and compare their costs based on conductor usage. The basis topology of the design method is based on discretized solenoids to enhance field homogeneity. Magnetic stress calculation is done to further prove the mechanical feasibility of their construction. Multi-width winding technique and outer notch structure are used to improve critical current characteristic. We apply consistent constraints for current margins, sizes, and field homogeneities to ensure an equal cost comparison. A graph is plotted to show the cost increase with magnetic flux growth. Additionally, we compare our designs to two additional MRI magnet designs from other publications with respect to the cost and magnetic flux, and present the linear relationship between them.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thermal effect of clinical brain MRI protocol with high magnetic fields (1.5 and 3.0 T MRI) in a phantom model pork sample
    Kim, M. S.
    Kim, Y. J.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 196 : S61 - S61
  • [32] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Harms, S. E.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (01): : 43 - 44
  • [33] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T: a pilot study
    Pineda, F. D.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M. K.
    Abe, H.
    Shimauchi, A.
    Newstead, G. M.
    Karczmar, G. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049):
  • [34] Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - Initial experience
    Gutberlet, M
    Spors, B
    Grothoff, M
    Freyhardt, P
    Schwinge, K
    Plotkin, M
    Amthauer, H
    Noeske, R
    Felix, R
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (06): : 801 - 808
  • [35] Comparison of brain 3.0-T with 1.5-T MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: A 6-month follow-up study
    Kataoka, Hiroshi
    Kiriyama, Takao
    Taoka, Toshiaki
    Oba, Naoki
    Takewa, Megumi
    Eura, Nobuyuki
    Syobatake, Ryogo
    Kobayashi, Yasuyo
    Kumazawa, Masahiro
    Izumi, Tesseki
    Furiya, Yoshiko
    Aoyama, Nobufusa
    Kichikawa, Kimihiko
    Ueno, Satoshi
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 121 : 55 - 58
  • [36] Design and Comparison of Rectangular, Square and Hexagonal RF Coils For 1.5T MRI System
    Ugle, Niket
    Dapkar, Radhika
    Bagchi, Soumendu
    Bhuiya, Tapas K.
    Shinde, D. M.
    2018 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2018,
  • [37] Design and manufacture of an ultra-compact, 1.5 T class, controlled-contact resistance, REBCO, brain imaging MRI magnet
    Parkinson, B.
    Bouloukakis, K.
    Weijers, H. W.
    Olatunji, J.
    Szmigiel, M.
    Hunter, M. W.
    Froelich, T.
    Bailey, J.
    Garwood, M.
    SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 37 (11):
  • [38] Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T MRI: both field strengths sensitively detect subclinical inflammation of hand and forefoot in patients with arthralgia
    Krijbolder, D., I
    Verstappen, M.
    Wouters, F.
    Lard, L. R.
    de Buck, P. D. M.
    Veris-van Dieren, J. J.
    Bloem, J. L.
    Reijnierse, M.
    Van der Helm-van Mil, A. H. M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 51 (04) : 284 - 290
  • [39] Fetal blood flow measured using phase contrast MRI-comparison of image quality and flow volume at 1.5T with 3.0T
    Beverly Tsai-Goodman
    Mike Seed
    Christopher Macgowan
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [40] COMPARISON OF SEMI-AUTOMATED METHODS TO QUANTIFY INFARCT SIZE AND MYOCARDIAL SALVAGE BY CARDIAC MRI AT 1.5T AND 3.0T FIELD STRENGTHS
    Khan, Jamal
    Nazir, Sheraz
    Horsfield, Mark
    Singh, Anvesha
    Kanagala, Prathap
    Greenwood, John
    Gershlick, Anthony
    McCann, Gerry
    HEART, 2014, 100 : A76 - A77