Discretized solenoid design of a 1.5 T and a 3.0 T REBCO wholebody MRI magnets with cost comparison according to magnetic flux

被引:0
|
作者
Jung, Wonju [1 ]
Kim, Geonyoung [1 ]
Choi, Kibum [1 ]
Park, Hyunsoo [1 ]
Hahn, Seungyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS | 2023年 / 25卷 / 04期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
MRI magnet; MRI cost; REBCO;
D O I
10.9714/psac.2023.25.4.075
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rare earth barium copper oxide (REBCO) materials have shown the possibility of high-temperature superconductor (HTS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnets due to their elevated transition temperature. While numerous MRI magnet designs have emerged, there is a growing emphasis on estimating the cost before manufacturing. In this paper, we propose two designs of REBCO whole-body MRI magnets: (1) 1.5 T and (2) 3.0 T, the standard center field choices for hospital use, and compare their costs based on conductor usage. The basis topology of the design method is based on discretized solenoids to enhance field homogeneity. Magnetic stress calculation is done to further prove the mechanical feasibility of their construction. Multi-width winding technique and outer notch structure are used to improve critical current characteristic. We apply consistent constraints for current margins, sizes, and field homogeneities to ensure an equal cost comparison. A graph is plotted to show the cost increase with magnetic flux growth. Additionally, we compare our designs to two additional MRI magnet designs from other publications with respect to the cost and magnetic flux, and present the linear relationship between them.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NUMERICAL MODELING AND DESIGN OF A SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOID GENERATOR OF 6T MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY
    Dobrin, Ion
    Enache, Dan
    Dobrin, Andrei
    Dumitru, George
    Pintea, Radu
    Popovici, Iuliu Romeo
    Zamfir, Stefania
    UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2020, 82 (02): : 201 - 210
  • [22] Numerical modeling and design of a superconducting solenoid generator of 6t magnetic flux density
    Dobrin, Ion
    Enache, Dan
    Dobrin, Andrei
    Dumitru, George
    Pintea, Radu
    Popovici, Iuliu Romeo
    Zamfir, Stefania
    UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2020, 82 (02): : 201 - 210
  • [23] Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T
    Capuani, Silvia
    Maiuro, Alessandra
    Giampa, Emiliano
    Montuori, Marco
    Varrucciu, Viviana
    Hagberg, Gisela E.
    Vinicola, Vincenzo
    Colonna, Sergio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [24] Conceptual designs of conduction cooled MgB2 magnets for 1.5 and 3.0T full body MRI systems
    Baig, Tanvir
    Al Amin, Abdullah
    Deissler, Robert J.
    Sabri, Laith
    Poole, Charles
    Brown, Robert W.
    Tomsic, Michael
    Doll, David
    Rindfleisch, Matthew
    Peng, Xuan
    Mendris, Robert
    Akkus, Ozan
    Sumption, Michael
    Martens, Michael
    SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 30 (04): : 1 - 32
  • [25] Intra-individual comparison of image contrast in SPIO-enhanced liver MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T
    Marcus von Falkenhausen
    Carsten Meyer
    Götz Lutterbey
    Nuschin Morakkabati
    Oliver Walter
    Jürgen Gieseke
    Renate Blömer
    Winfried A. Willinek
    Christiane K. Kuhl
    Hans H. Schild
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1256 - 1261
  • [26] Intra-individual comparison of image contrast in SPIO-enhanced liver MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T
    von Falkenhausen, Marcus
    Meyer, Carsten
    Lutterbey, Goetz
    Morakkabati, Nuschin
    Walter, Oliver
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Bloemer, Renate
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Schild, Hans H.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (05) : 1256 - 1261
  • [27] Breast MRI at 3.0 T in a high-risk familial breast cancer screening cohort: comparison with 1.5 T screening studies
    Pickles, M. D.
    Turnbull, L. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1015): : 990 - 995
  • [28] Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: A prospective comparison study of image quality
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Oelers, C.
    Dietzel, F.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Arsov, C.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Blondin, D.
    Wittsack, H. J.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 : 192 - 197
  • [29] Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Intraindividual Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kim, Chong Soo
    Han, Young Min
    Yu, Hee Chul
    Choi, Dongil
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (06) : 383 - 389
  • [30] An Investigation Into the Effect of Different Static Magnetic Fields of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI on the Measurement of Tumor Diameters in Breast Cancer
    Yamamoto, Shinji
    Okada, Yukinori
    Yoshida, Nobukiyo
    Takeshita, Koji
    Sakurai, Noriko
    Ichikawa, Atsushi
    Takimoto, Manabu
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)