A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic

被引:3
|
作者
Kemchoknatee, Parinee [1 ]
Sunlakaviset, Pornlada [1 ]
Khieokhoen, Nattawat [1 ]
Srisombut, Thansit [1 ]
Tangon, Duanghathai [1 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Rajavithi Hosp, Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
spherical equivalent; cylindrical power; spherical power; refraction; subjective refraction; autorefraction; autorefractor; REPEATABILITY; ERRORS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.37448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Refractive error is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity. Refractive measurement in adults consists of cycloplegic (objective) and manifest (subjective) refraction. Although the effectiveness of autorefraction is a crucial factor, there needs to be more information on its accuracy and precision on each autorefractor compared with subjective measurement in Thai patients.Objective: To compare the accuracy and precision of the two autorefractors' findings in Rajavithi Hospital, OptoChek Plus, and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000, with each other and with those of the subjective method.Materials & Methods: An observational study was conducted at the Ophthalmology clinic in Rajavithi Hospital from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All subjects were tested using the two autorefractors (OptoChek Plus and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000) and subjective refraction. One eye per subject was included in the study.Results: Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The difference between spherical powers obtained by OptoChek and subjective refraction was not significantly different; however, there was a significant difference between those calculated by Tomey and the subjective method (p=0.77, p=0.04 respectively). The variations between cylindrical powers arrived at by the two autorefraction techniques and those calculated by the subjective method were significantly different (OptoChek and Tomey p-=0.01, p-value<0.001, respectively). In addition, 95% of the limit of agreement (95% of LOA) was low in the cylindrical measurement of each autorefractor compared with subjective refraction. (84.61%, 86.36%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between the spherical equivalent calculated by the two autorefractors and that of subjective refraction was observed in the present study (OptoChek: p-value=0.26 and Tomey: p-value=0.77).Conclusions: There was a clinically significant difference between the cylindrical power calculated by the two autorefractors and those obtained from subjective refraction. Patients with high astigmatism should be monitored closely when measured by autorefractors, as there can be a slightly lower agreement between objective and subjective refraction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of wavefront measurement of refractive error with subjective refraction
    Yee, K
    Tuan, KMA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U25 - U25
  • [32] Implementation of PROMIS® in an Optometry Clinic
    Porter, Randall S.
    Holt, Kathleen
    Ramchandran, Rajeev S.
    PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2021, 12 : 307 - 312
  • [33] Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
    Yadi Lei
    Xun Chen
    Mingrui Cheng
    Boliang Li
    Yinjie Jiang
    Yilin Xu
    Xiaoying Wang
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 1465 - 1472
  • [34] Manifest refraction versus autorefraction for patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization
    Orr, PR
    Cramer, LD
    Hawkins, BS
    Bressler, NM
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [35] Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
    Lei, Yadi
    Chen, Xun
    Cheng, Mingrui
    Li, Boliang
    Jiang, Yinjie
    Xu, Yilin
    Wang, Xiaoying
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (05) : 1465 - 1472
  • [36] Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study
    Guo, Rui
    Shi, Li
    Xu, Ke
    Hong, Dejian
    TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2022, 11 (06) : 933 - 946
  • [37] Subjective refraction
    Tenney, JA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1904, 43 : 2030 - 2031
  • [38] COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS
    Ee, Chye Li
    Samsudin, Amir
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 588 - 594
  • [39] Validation of autorefraction and relative peripheral refraction with a pyramidal wavefront sensor
    Nti, Augustine
    Dolce, Jackson
    Berntsen, David
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [40] Retinoscopy/autorefraction:: Which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge, J
    Queirós, A
    Almeida, JB
    Parafita, MA
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2005, 82 (01) : 64 - 68