A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic

被引:3
|
作者
Kemchoknatee, Parinee [1 ]
Sunlakaviset, Pornlada [1 ]
Khieokhoen, Nattawat [1 ]
Srisombut, Thansit [1 ]
Tangon, Duanghathai [1 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Rajavithi Hosp, Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
spherical equivalent; cylindrical power; spherical power; refraction; subjective refraction; autorefraction; autorefractor; REPEATABILITY; ERRORS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.37448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Refractive error is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity. Refractive measurement in adults consists of cycloplegic (objective) and manifest (subjective) refraction. Although the effectiveness of autorefraction is a crucial factor, there needs to be more information on its accuracy and precision on each autorefractor compared with subjective measurement in Thai patients.Objective: To compare the accuracy and precision of the two autorefractors' findings in Rajavithi Hospital, OptoChek Plus, and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000, with each other and with those of the subjective method.Materials & Methods: An observational study was conducted at the Ophthalmology clinic in Rajavithi Hospital from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All subjects were tested using the two autorefractors (OptoChek Plus and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000) and subjective refraction. One eye per subject was included in the study.Results: Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The difference between spherical powers obtained by OptoChek and subjective refraction was not significantly different; however, there was a significant difference between those calculated by Tomey and the subjective method (p=0.77, p=0.04 respectively). The variations between cylindrical powers arrived at by the two autorefraction techniques and those calculated by the subjective method were significantly different (OptoChek and Tomey p-=0.01, p-value<0.001, respectively). In addition, 95% of the limit of agreement (95% of LOA) was low in the cylindrical measurement of each autorefractor compared with subjective refraction. (84.61%, 86.36%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between the spherical equivalent calculated by the two autorefractors and that of subjective refraction was observed in the present study (OptoChek: p-value=0.26 and Tomey: p-value=0.77).Conclusions: There was a clinically significant difference between the cylindrical power calculated by the two autorefractors and those obtained from subjective refraction. Patients with high astigmatism should be monitored closely when measured by autorefractors, as there can be a slightly lower agreement between objective and subjective refraction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Academic Motivation in Different Phases of Optometry Studies
    Buari, Noor Halilah
    Alim, Hendrry Win
    ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 5 (15):
  • [23] Comparison of Cycloplegic refraction between Retinoscopy, Closed field and Open field autorefraction in Pseudomyopia
    Huaindeen, Jameel Rizwana
    Ramani, Krishna Kumar
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [24] Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres-Valderas, Laura
    Gonzalez-Bergaz, Anahi
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [25] COMPARISON OF NEAR RETINOSCOPY AND SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION IN ADULTS
    MOHINDRA, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1977, 54 (05): : 319 - 322
  • [26] A comparison between aberrometry-based automated subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction in keratoconus patients
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Torres, Carlos Carpena
    Pastrana, Crisitna
    Privado, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Vidal, Teresa Espinosa
    Lafora, Maria Rodriguez
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [27] Effects and Related Factors of Short-time Accommodation Training on Measuring Consistency of InnovEyes Sitemap, Autorefraction, and Subjective Refraction
    Jin, Chengcheng
    Wang, Shiyuan
    Ye, Hehua
    Wei, Ruihua
    Dong, Yuan
    Zhao, Peiquan
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 40 (12)
  • [28] Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight handheld autorefractor versus cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopic refraction
    Iuorno, JD
    Grant, WD
    Noël, LP
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2004, 8 (02): : 123 - 127
  • [29] The Aging of Academic Optometry
    Twa, Michael
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2016, 93 (11) : 1337 - 1338
  • [30] Comparison of Self-service Refractor with Auto-refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Zhen, Yi
    Shen, Jing
    Hao, Jie
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)