Comparison between two computational fluid dynamics methods for gust response predictions

被引:3
|
作者
Wu, Zhenlong [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
He, Xiaoming [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Weizhe [1 ]
Shi, Jianqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Zhibo [1 ]
Zhou, Ruitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Integrated Energy Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
unsteady aerodynamics; gust; CFD; Sears function; OpenFOAM;
D O I
10.1177/09544100231163202
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Based on the open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) platform, OpenFOAM, two numerical simulation methods for gusty inflow characterization and gust response prediction are implemented by solving the fundamental incompressible unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations. One is the Field Velocity Method (FVM) and the other is the Oscillating Vane Method (OVM). The gust velocity field is characterized and the aerodynamic responses of some airfoils under the Sears-type sinusoidal gusts are predicted by both gust simulation methods. The results indicate that both methods are capable of obtaining satisfactory gusty inflow conditions as expected as well as the airfoil aerodynamic responses. Comparatively, from the perspective of computing cost, the FVM is more advantageous in reducing the computational resources than the OVM while simultaneously ensuring the computational accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2833 / 2843
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THERMAL AND FLUID STRUCTURE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS - COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
    WASHBY, V
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1984, 23 (01): : 29 - 29
  • [42] Interfacing nonequilibrium models with computational fluid dynamics methods
    Candler, GV
    Bose, D
    Olejniczak, J
    MOLECULAR PHYSICS AND HYPERSONIC FLOWS, 1996, 482 : 625 - 644
  • [43] Comparison between Compartment and Computational Fluid Dynamics Models for Simulating Reactive Crystallization Processes
    Querio, Andrea
    Shiea, Mohsen
    Buffo, Antonio
    Marchisio, Daniele Luca
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (50) : 21991 - 22004
  • [44] A study on the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability using two different computational fluid dynamics methods
    Atmakidis T.
    Kenig E.
    Journal of Computational Multiphase Flows, 2010, 2 (01): : 33 - 45
  • [45] COMPARISON OF HYDRODYNAMIC LOAD PREDICTIONS BETWEEN REDUCED ORDER ENGINEERING MODELS AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS FOR THE OC4-DEEPCWIND SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE
    Benitz, Maija A.
    Schmidt, David P.
    Lackner, Matthew A.
    Stewart, Gordon M.
    Jonkman, Jason
    Robertson, Amy
    33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2014, VOL 9B: OCEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014,
  • [46] Explicit two-step Runge-Kutta methods for computational fluid dynamics solvers
    Figueroa, Alejandro
    Jackiewicz, Zdzislaw
    Lohner, Rainald
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2021, 93 (02) : 429 - 444
  • [47] A Simple Model to Identify Dryout Location: Validation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Predictions
    Pothukuchi, Harish
    Patnaik, B. S. V. Prasad
    Prasad, Bhamidi V. S. S. S.
    HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING, 2021, 43 (02) : 141 - 156
  • [48] Aircraft T-tail flutter predictions using computational fluid dynamics
    Attorni, A.
    Cavagna, L.
    Quaranta, G.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2011, 27 (02) : 161 - 174
  • [49] Accelerating computational fluid dynamics based aeroelastic predictions using system identification
    Cowan, TJ
    Arena, AS
    Gupta, KK
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2001, 38 (01): : 81 - 87
  • [50] Computational fluid dynamics modeling for emergency preparedness and response
    Lee, RL
    Albritton, JR
    Ermak, DL
    Kim, J
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 1997, 12 (01) : 43 - 50