Comparison between two computational fluid dynamics methods for gust response predictions

被引:3
|
作者
Wu, Zhenlong [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
He, Xiaoming [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Weizhe [1 ]
Shi, Jianqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Zhibo [1 ]
Zhou, Ruitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Integrated Energy Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
unsteady aerodynamics; gust; CFD; Sears function; OpenFOAM;
D O I
10.1177/09544100231163202
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Based on the open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) platform, OpenFOAM, two numerical simulation methods for gusty inflow characterization and gust response prediction are implemented by solving the fundamental incompressible unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations. One is the Field Velocity Method (FVM) and the other is the Oscillating Vane Method (OVM). The gust velocity field is characterized and the aerodynamic responses of some airfoils under the Sears-type sinusoidal gusts are predicted by both gust simulation methods. The results indicate that both methods are capable of obtaining satisfactory gusty inflow conditions as expected as well as the airfoil aerodynamic responses. Comparatively, from the perspective of computing cost, the FVM is more advantageous in reducing the computational resources than the OVM while simultaneously ensuring the computational accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2833 / 2843
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of computational fluid dynamics with transcranial Doppler ultrasound in response to physiological stimuli
    Harrison T. Caddy
    Hannah J. Thomas
    Lachlan J. Kelsey
    Kurt J. Smith
    Barry J. Doyle
    Daniel J. Green
    Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2024, 23 : 255 - 269
  • [22] Comparison of computational fluid dynamics with transcranial Doppler ultrasound in response to physiological stimuli
    Caddy, Harrison T.
    Thomas, Hannah J.
    Kelsey, Lachlan J.
    Smith, Kurt J.
    Doyle, Barry J.
    Green, Daniel J.
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2024, 23 (01) : 255 - 269
  • [23] Spectral methods in computational fluid dynamics - Preface
    Azaiez, Mejdi
    Mund, Ernest H.
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2008, 58 (07) : 933 - 934
  • [24] PANEL METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    HESS, JL
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1990, 22 : 255 - 274
  • [25] MULTIGRID METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    WESSELING, P
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1990, 70 (05): : T337 - T347
  • [26] Computational fluid dynamics methods for astrophysical applications
    Pogorelov, NV
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS '98, VOL 1, PARTS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 815 - 820
  • [27] The Research and Application on Computational Methods in Fluid Dynamics
    Su Keqin
    Wang Yawei
    Wang Jianping
    EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, PTS 1-3, 2011, 317-319 : 807 - 810
  • [28] Moving mesh methods for computational fluid dynamics
    Tang, T
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ADAPTIVE COMPUTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 383 : 141 - 173
  • [29] Parallel extrapolation methods for computational fluid dynamics
    Leland, R.W.
    Rollett, J.S.
    Lecture Notes in Physics, 1990, (371):
  • [30] Comparison of Shape Optimization Methods for Heat Exchanger Fins Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Weber, Justin
    Huckaby, E. David
    Straub, Douglas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2023, 207