Comparison between two computational fluid dynamics methods for gust response predictions

被引:3
|
作者
Wu, Zhenlong [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
He, Xiaoming [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Weizhe [1 ]
Shi, Jianqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Zhibo [1 ]
Zhou, Ruitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Integrated Energy Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
unsteady aerodynamics; gust; CFD; Sears function; OpenFOAM;
D O I
10.1177/09544100231163202
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Based on the open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) platform, OpenFOAM, two numerical simulation methods for gusty inflow characterization and gust response prediction are implemented by solving the fundamental incompressible unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations. One is the Field Velocity Method (FVM) and the other is the Oscillating Vane Method (OVM). The gust velocity field is characterized and the aerodynamic responses of some airfoils under the Sears-type sinusoidal gusts are predicted by both gust simulation methods. The results indicate that both methods are capable of obtaining satisfactory gusty inflow conditions as expected as well as the airfoil aerodynamic responses. Comparatively, from the perspective of computing cost, the FVM is more advantageous in reducing the computational resources than the OVM while simultaneously ensuring the computational accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2833 / 2843
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Negative Pressure Irrigation Dynamics between Two Needle Designs using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Rahman, Wan Nur Farhana Wan Abdul
    Ramlan, Nurul Ain
    Mahmood, Nik Zarina Nik
    Hamid, Ahmad Hussein Abdul
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2023, 17
  • [32] Pressure drop predictions in microfibrous materials using computational fluid dynamics
    Duggirala, Ravi K.
    Roy, Christopher J.
    Saeidi, S. M.
    Khodadadi, Jay M.
    Cahela, Don R.
    Tatarchuk, Bruce J.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (07): : 0713021 - 07130213
  • [33] Comparison of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Predictions of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Performance Against Detailed Pressure Measurements
    Elsakka, Mohamed M.
    Ingham, Derek B.
    Ma, Lin
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (01): : 276 - 293
  • [34] Comparison of Two Microalgae Rectangular Airlift Photobioreactors Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
    Muhammad, Hafidho Ilham
    Rahman, Arif
    Deendarlianto
    Prihantini, Nining Betawati
    Nasruddin
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL RENEWABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (I-TREC 2019), 2020, 2255
  • [35] PROGRESS IN ADAPTIVE METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    ODEN, JT
    ADAPTIVE METHODS FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 1989, : 206 - 252
  • [36] Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods for Wind Resources Assessment
    Upnere, Sabine
    Bezrukovs, Valerijs
    Bezrukovs, Vladislavs
    Jekabsons, Normunds
    Gulbe, Linda
    NUMERICAL COMPUTATIONS: THEORY AND ALGORITHMS, PT II, 2020, 11974 : 495 - 502
  • [37] Computational vascular fluid dynamics: Problems, models and methods
    Quarteroni, Alfio
    Tuveri, Massimiliano
    Veneziani, Alessandro
    2000, Springer Verlag (02)
  • [38] Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods for Hypersonic Flows
    Candler, Graham V.
    Subbareddy, Pramod K.
    Brock, Joseph M.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2015, 52 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [39] DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    GROPP, WD
    KEYES, DE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 1992, 14 (02) : 147 - 165
  • [40] IMPLICIT SOLUTION METHODS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
    PULLIAM, TH
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 1986, 2 (06) : 441 - 474