Verifying the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis Using High Spatial Resolution 3D Phase-contrast MR Imaging on a 7T MR System: Comparison with a 3T System

被引:0
|
作者
Tajima, Shunsuke [1 ,2 ]
Isoda, Haruo [3 ,4 ]
Fukunaga, Masaki [5 ]
Komori, Yoshiaki [6 ]
Naganawa, Shinji [7 ]
Sadato, Norihiro [5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Med Lab Sci, Radiol Sci, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol Technol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Brain & Mind Res Ctr, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Integrated Hlth Sci, 1-1-20 Daiko Minami,Higashi Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4618673, Japan
[5] Natl Inst Physiol Sci, Div Cerebral Integrat, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
[6] Siemens Healthcare KK, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[8] Ritsumeikan Univ, Res Org Sci & Technol, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
hemodynamics; intracranial artery; phase-contrast MR imaging; 4D flow MRI; magnetic field strength; UNRUPTURED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SHEAR-STRESS; FLOW; VELOCITY; RUPTURE; RISK; QUANTIFICATION; QUALITY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Hemodynamics is important in the initiation, growth, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Since intracranial aneurysms are small, a high -field MR system with high spatial resolution and high SNR is desirable for this hemodynamic analysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the accuracy of MR fluid dynamic (MRFD) results based on 3D phase -contrast MR (3D PC MR, non-electrocardiogram[ECG]-gated 4D Flow MRI) data from a human cerebrovascular phantom and human healthy subjects obtained by a 7T MR system was superior to those by a 3T MR system. Methods: 3D PC MR and 3D time of flight MR angiography (3D TOF MRA) imaging were performed on a 3T MR system and a 7T MR system for a human cerebrovascular phantom and 10 healthy human subjects, and MRFD analysis was performed using these data. The MRFD results from each MR system were then compared with the following items based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results: 3D velocity vector field; correlation coefficient (R), angular similarity index (ASI), and magnitude similarity index (MSI) of blood flow velocity vectors. Results: In the MRFD results of 3D velocity vectors of the cerebrovascular phantom, noise -like vectors were observed near the vascular wall on the 3T MR system, but no noise was observed on the 7T MR system, showing results similar to those of CFD. In the MRFD results of the cerebrovascular phantom and healthy subjects, the correlation coefficients R, ASI, and MSI of the 7T MR system were higher than those of the 3T MR system, and ASI and MSI of healthy human subjects were significantly different between the two systems. Conclusions: The accuracy of high spatial resolution MRFD using the 7T MR system exceeded that of the 3T MR system.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 102
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography
    M. Oelerich
    M. G. Lentschig
    P. Zunker
    P. Reimer
    E. J. Rummeny
    G. Schuierer
    Neuroradiology, 1998, 40 : 567 - 573
  • [42] High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T
    Priovoulos, Nikos
    Jacobs, Heidi I. L.
    Ivanov, Dimo
    Uludag, Kamil
    Verhey, Frans R. J.
    Poser, Benedikt A.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 427 - 436
  • [43] High-resolution intracranial vessel wall MRI in an elderly asymptomatic population: comparison of 3T and 7T
    Anita A. Harteveld
    Anja G. van der Kolk
    H. Bart van der Worp
    Nikki Dieleman
    Jeroen C. W. Siero
    Hugo J. Kuijf
    Catharina J. M. Frijns
    Peter R. Luijten
    Jaco J. M. Zwanenburg
    Jeroen Hendrikse
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 1585 - 1595
  • [44] Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography
    Anzalone, N.
    Scomazzoni, F.
    Cirillo, M.
    Righi, C.
    Simionato, F.
    Cadioli, M.
    Iadanza, A.
    Kirchin, M. A.
    Scotti, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (08) : 1530 - 1536
  • [45] High-resolution intracranial vessel wall MRI in an elderly asymptomatic population: comparison of 3T and 7T
    Harteveld, Anita A.
    van der Kolk, Anja G.
    van der Worp, H. Bart
    Dieleman, Nikki
    Siero, Jeroen C. W.
    Kuijf, Hugo J.
    Frijns, Catharina J. M.
    Luijten, Peter R.
    Zwanenburg, Jaco J. M.
    Hendrikse, Jeroen
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 1585 - 1595
  • [46] In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage
    Bitar, Richard
    Moody, Alan R.
    Leung, General
    Symons, Sean
    Crisp, Susan
    Butany, Jagdish
    Rowsell, Corwyn
    Kiss, Alexander
    Nelson, Andrew
    Maggisano, Robert
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (01) : 259 - 267
  • [47] Quantitative 3D mapping of total choline in human breast cancer using high-speed MR spectroscopic imaging at 3T
    Posse, Stefan
    Zhang, Tongsheng
    Royce, Melanie
    Dayao, Zoneddy
    Lopez, Susan
    Sillerud, Laurel
    Eberhardt, Steven
    Lomo, Lesley
    Lee, Sang-Joon
    Rajput, Ashwani
    Russell, John
    Casey, Linda
    Bolan, Patrick
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [48] Comparison of 1.5-T 3D SPACE MR Imaging of the Knee vs Conventional MR Imaging of the Knee
    Magee, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [49] Accelerated Pseudo 3D Dynamic Speech MR Imaging at 3T Using Unsupervised Deep Variational Manifold Learning
    Rusho, Rushdi Zahid
    Zou, Qing
    Alam, Wahidul
    Erattakulangara, Subin
    Jacob, Mathews
    Lingala, Sajan Goud
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION, MICCAI 2022, PT VI, 2022, 13436 : 697 - 706
  • [50] Clinical High-Resolution 3D-MR Spectroscopic Imaging of the Human Brain at 7 T
    Hingerl, Lukas
    Strasser, Bernhard
    Moser, Philipp
    Hangel, Gilbert
    Motyka, Stanislav
    Heckova, Eva
    Gruber, Stephan
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2020, 55 (04) : 239 - 248