Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from wood sawdust

被引:4
|
作者
Alizadeh, Peyman [1 ]
Mupondwa, Edmund [1 ,2 ]
Tabil, Lope G. [1 ]
Li, Xue [2 ]
Cree, Duncan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Saskatoon Res & Dev Ctr, Bioprod & Bioproc Natl Sci Program, Sci & Technol Branch, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Mech Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pellet; Sawdust; Electricity; Heat; Circular economy; WHEAT-STRAW DENSIFICATION; ELECTRICITY; PELLETS; TORREFACTION; PRETREATMENT; ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIESEL; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138936
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy derived from wood waste plays a crucial role in mitigating climate change and contributing to the circular economy. This study performs a life cycle assessment of pellet production from wood sawdust and subsequent electricity generation through different pathways. Firstly, the environmental impact of producing pellets from untreated mixed sawdust, steam exploded (SE) shavings (at 180 degrees C for 9 min), and torrefied (TF) sawdust (at 230 degrees C for 45 min) was compared using the Functional unit (FU) of 1 Kg. Secondly, the environmental impact of generating 1 MJ electricity from untreated sawdust, SE pellets, and TF pellets was compared in terms of impact categories and damage assessment. The scope of the study was defined from the gate (received feedstock) to the gate (produced output ex-factory). The results revealed that TF pellets were more environmentally friendly relative to other forms except for two impact categories: ozone layer depletion and aquatic eutrophication. SE treatment was the most damaging alternative for producing pellets, especially with respect to global warming; it produced 0.56 kg CO2 equivalent (eq.) per FU around 4 times higher than untreated pellets (0.16 kg CO2 eq./FU). After environmental impact analysis, it was found that electricity generation from SE pellets caused more damage to the environment compared to the other feedstock paths for electricity production. Utilizing TF pellets for electricity generation is more beneficial in terms of ecosystem quality, climate change, and resource depletion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings
    Nebel, B
    Zimmer, B
    Wegener, G
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION OF WOOD AND NON-WOOD FOREST PRODUCTS, 2003, 604 : 39 - 41
  • [42] Multi-Criteria and Life Cycle Assessment of Wood-Based Bioenergy Alternatives for Residential Heating: A Sustainability Analysis
    Martin-Gamboa, Mario
    Dias, Luis C.
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Freire, Fausto
    Arroja, Luis
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (22)
  • [43] Design of process parameters for the production of xylose from wood sawdust
    Rafiqul, I. S. M.
    Sakinah, A. M. Mimi
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2012, 90 (09): : 1307 - 1312
  • [44] A comparative life cycle assessment of centralised and decentralised wood pellets production for residential heating
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Greco, Francesco
    da Cruz Tarelho, Luis Antonio
    Righi, Serena
    Arroja, Luis
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 730
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment of a coniferous wood supply chain for pallet production in Catalonia, Spain
    Garcia-Duranona, Lucia
    Farreny, Ramon
    Navarro, Pere
    Boschmonart-Rives, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 178 - 188
  • [46] Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction
    Adams, P. W. R.
    Shirley, J. E. J.
    McManus, M. C.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 : 367 - 380
  • [47] Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural Wood Production-Methodological Options: a Literature Review
    Perdomo E., E. Alejandro
    Schwarzbauer, Peter
    Fuertner, Daniela
    Hesser, Franziska
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (02) : 492 - 509
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: Critical review of life cycle inventories
    Duval-Dachary, S.
    Beauchet, S.
    Lorne, D.
    Salou, T.
    Helias, A.
    Pastor, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 183
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of end-of-life engineered wood
    Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan
    Tokede, Olubukola
    Tao, Zhong
    Ashraf, Mahmud
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 887
  • [50] Evaluation of biochar-derived carbocatalysts for pyrolytic conversion of sawdust: Life cycle assessment towards monophenol production
    Cao, Bin
    Jiang, Ding
    Zheng, Yijie
    Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh
    Yuan, Chuan
    Hu, Yamin
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Chao
    Hu, Xun
    Wang, Shuang
    Yuan, Jianping
    Abomohra, Abdelfatah
    FUEL, 2022, 330