Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from wood sawdust

被引:4
|
作者
Alizadeh, Peyman [1 ]
Mupondwa, Edmund [1 ,2 ]
Tabil, Lope G. [1 ]
Li, Xue [2 ]
Cree, Duncan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Saskatoon Res & Dev Ctr, Bioprod & Bioproc Natl Sci Program, Sci & Technol Branch, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Mech Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pellet; Sawdust; Electricity; Heat; Circular economy; WHEAT-STRAW DENSIFICATION; ELECTRICITY; PELLETS; TORREFACTION; PRETREATMENT; ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIESEL; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138936
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy derived from wood waste plays a crucial role in mitigating climate change and contributing to the circular economy. This study performs a life cycle assessment of pellet production from wood sawdust and subsequent electricity generation through different pathways. Firstly, the environmental impact of producing pellets from untreated mixed sawdust, steam exploded (SE) shavings (at 180 degrees C for 9 min), and torrefied (TF) sawdust (at 230 degrees C for 45 min) was compared using the Functional unit (FU) of 1 Kg. Secondly, the environmental impact of generating 1 MJ electricity from untreated sawdust, SE pellets, and TF pellets was compared in terms of impact categories and damage assessment. The scope of the study was defined from the gate (received feedstock) to the gate (produced output ex-factory). The results revealed that TF pellets were more environmentally friendly relative to other forms except for two impact categories: ozone layer depletion and aquatic eutrophication. SE treatment was the most damaging alternative for producing pellets, especially with respect to global warming; it produced 0.56 kg CO2 equivalent (eq.) per FU around 4 times higher than untreated pellets (0.16 kg CO2 eq./FU). After environmental impact analysis, it was found that electricity generation from SE pellets caused more damage to the environment compared to the other feedstock paths for electricity production. Utilizing TF pellets for electricity generation is more beneficial in terms of ecosystem quality, climate change, and resource depletion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of eucalyptus short rotation coppices for bioenergy production in southern France
    Gabrielle, Benoit
    Nicolas Nguyen The
    Maupu, Pauline
    Vial, Estelle
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2013, 5 (01): : 30 - 42
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production
    Daniela Dressler
    Achim Loewen
    Michael Nelles
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 1104 - 1115
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production
    Dressler, Daniela
    Loewen, Achim
    Nelles, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (09): : 1104 - 1115
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of different bioenergy production systems including perennial and annual crops
    Fazio, Simone
    Monti, Andrea
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (12): : 4868 - 4878
  • [25] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Fang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Yubing
    Liu, Yunfei
    Yu, Jiacheng
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Rashwan, Ahmed K.
    Chen, Zhonghao
    Chen, Lin
    Ihara, Ikko
    Rooney, David W.
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 22 (03) : 1115 - 1154
  • [26] Life Cycle Assessment of bioenergy production from mountainous grasslands invaded by lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.)
    Joseph, Ben
    Hensgen, Frank
    Wachendorf, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 275 (275)
  • [27] Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice-a life cycle assessment
    Roedl, Anne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (06): : 567 - 578
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system
    Heller, MC
    Keoleian, GA
    Volk, TA
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2003, 25 (02): : 147 - 165
  • [29] Bioenergy life cycle assessment and management in energy generation
    Taylan, Osman
    Kaya, Durmus
    Bakhsh, Ahmed A.
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2018, 36 (01) : 166 - 181
  • [30] Sustainability of wood products: environmental performance of wood pellets' production by means of Life Cycle Assessment
    Laschi, Andrea
    Marchi, Enrico
    Garcia, Sara Gonzalez
    FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: CHALLENGES FOR FOREST ENGINEERING, 2016, : 317 - 317