Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production

被引:112
|
作者
Dressler, Daniela [1 ]
Loewen, Achim [1 ]
Nelles, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Fac Resource Management, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Biogas plant; Cultivation concept; Energy crops; LCA; Regional parameters;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0424-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article evaluates the parameters that influence the results of a life cycle assessment (LCA) of biogas production from maize and the conversion of biogas into electricity. The environmental impacts of biogas vary according to regional farming procedures and, therefore, the soil, climate conditions, crop yield, and cultivation management. This study focuses on these regional parameters and the existing infrastructure, including the number of installed biogas plants and their share of used heat. To assess the regional impact, the LCAs of maize cultivation, on the one hand, and the production and use of biogas, on the other, were performed for three different areas. These areas were the administrative districts of Celle, Hildesheim, and Goettingen; all located in the south of Lower Saxony, Germany. The areas differed in geographic location conditions, crop yield, and the number of installed biogas plants. The necessary data for modeling the cultivation of maize were derived from the specific regional and local parameters of each area. The most important parameters were the soil characteristics and the climate conditions for cultivating maize. The share of used heat from combined heat and power unit (CHP) was another relevant factor for biogas production and use. Our results demonstrate significant differences among the investigated areas. The smallest environmental impact of all the considered categories occurs in Goettingen and the largest in Celle. The net greenhouse gas emissions vary from 0.179 kg CO2 eq./kWh(el) in Celle to 0.058 kg CO2 eq./kWh(el) in Goettingen. This result is due to the maize cultivation system and the different credits for using heat from the CHP. Variances in energy crop cultivation result from different nitrogen and irrigation demands. In addition, despite higher applications of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation, the maize yield is lower in Celle. The impact category of total fossil energy shows similar results to that of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The results range from -0.274 to 0.175 kWh/kWh(el). The results of acidification and eutrophication vary from 1.62 in Goettingen to 1.94 g SO2 eq./kWh(el) in Celle and respectively 0.330 to 0.397 g PO (4) (3-) eq./kWh(el). These differences are primarily caused by maize cultivation, especially irrigation. Cultivating maize and using waste heat from the CHP were identified as the most influential parameters for the GHG emissions and total fossil energy demand. Regarding acidification and eutrophication, the most relevant factors are the application of digester output and the emissions from the CHP. Our results show the need to consider regional parameters in the LCA of bioenergies, particularly biogas production and use, especially if the LCA studies are used for generalized evaluations such as statements on the climate protection potential of biogas.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1115
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production
    Daniela Dressler
    Achim Loewen
    Michael Nelles
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 1104 - 1115
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Optimization of Regional Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chains
    Cucek, Lidija
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Varbanov, Petar Sabev
    Kravanja, Zdravko
    [J]. PRES 2011: 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 25 : 575 - +
  • [3] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Production from Different Wood Pellet Supply Chains
    Sgarbossa, Andrea
    Boschiero, Martina
    Pierobon, Francesca
    Cavalli, Raffaele
    Zanetti, Michela
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (11): : 1 - 16
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review
    Mano Esteves, Elisa Maria
    Naranjo Herrera, Ana Maria
    Pecanha Esteves, Victor Paulo
    Vaz Morgado, Claudia do Rosario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 411 - 423
  • [5] Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe
    Hijazi, O.
    Munro, S.
    Zerhusen, B.
    Effenberger, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 : 1291 - 1300
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of maize cultivation for biogas production
    Bacenetti, J.
    Fusi, A.
    Guidetti, R.
    Fiala, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 44 : 579 - 582
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale
    Patterson, Tim
    Esteves, Sandra
    Dinsdale, Richard
    Guwy, Alan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (15) : 7313 - 7323
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from wood sawdust
    Alizadeh, Peyman
    Mupondwa, Edmund
    Tabil, Lope G.
    Li, Xue
    Cree, Duncan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 427
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure
    Hijazi, O.
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Samer, M.
    Attia, Y. A.
    Amer, B. M. A.
    Amer, M. A.
    Badr, M.
    Bernhardt, H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 148 : 417 - 424
  • [10] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE IMPACT OF BIOENERGY FROM A LANDSCAPE
    Hammar, T.
    Sundberg, C.
    Stendahl, J.
    Larsolle, A.
    Hansson, P. -A.
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1493 - 1497