Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural Wood Production-Methodological Options: a Literature Review

被引:3
|
作者
Perdomo E., E. Alejandro [1 ]
Schwarzbauer, Peter [2 ]
Fuertner, Daniela [1 ]
Hesser, Franziska [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kompetenzzentrum Holz GmbH, Wood K Plus Competence Ctr Wood Composites & Wood, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Mkt & Innovat, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Bioeconomy; Environmental assessment; Short-rotation coppice; Dendromass; Sustainability; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; GREENHOUSE-GAS BALANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; WILLOW BIOMASS; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; ASSESSMENT LCA; POPLAR; ELECTRICITY; BIOECONOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-021-10266-4
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In Europe, poplar and other fast-growing tree species are considered valuable resources for meeting the required wood demand of the rising bioeconomy. The agricultural technique of short rotation coppice (SRC) has gained relevance to ease the pressure of the demand for wood from forests. Previous studies have implemented the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate such systems' potential environmental impacts. These studies present different outcomes, though a general pattern on the potential benefit of SRC is observed. The variation of relevant methodological options, such as goal and scope, system boundary, functional unit, reference system, data source, characterization models, and impact categories assessed can significantly affect the results. A consequence of this discrepancy is its effect on results' interpretation, making the absolute comparison of case studies challenging and hindering the understanding of the potential impacts of SRC LCAs in support of developing a sustainable bioeconomy. Therefore, the current research attempts to understand the methodological implementation of LCA in assessing SRC value chains. Through literature research, studies are analyzed based on the four LCA phases. One of the results of this study shows how most of the articles focus on assessing the impact category related to climate change, while other environmental issues that are particularly relevant for agricultural woody biomass systems are seldomly evaluated. By discussing the state of the art of SRC LCA, this review paper attempts to suggest improvements that will allow future LCA studies to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the overall environmental impact of SRC systems.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 509
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural Wood Production—Methodological Options: a Literature Review
    E. Alejandro Perdomo E.
    Peter Schwarzbauer
    Daniela Fürtner
    Franziska Hesser
    [J]. BioEnergy Research, 2021, 14 : 492 - 509
  • [2] Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges
    Keiser, Dennis
    Schnoor, Lars Henrik
    Pupkes, Birte
    Freitag, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 110
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment on Agricultural Production: A Mini Review on Methodology, Application, and Challenges
    Fan, Jianling
    Liu, Cuiying
    Xie, Jianan
    Han, Lu
    Zhang, Chuanhong
    Guo, Dengwei
    Niu, Junzhao
    Jin, Hao
    McConkey, Brian G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (16)
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of aquaculture bivalve shellfish production — a critical review of methodological trends
    Johan Andrés Vélez-Henao
    Franz Weinland
    Norbert Reintjes
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1943 - 1958
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of aquaculture bivalve shellfish production - a critical review of methodological trends
    Velez-Henao, Johan Andres
    Weinland, Franz
    Reintjes, Norbert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (10): : 1943 - 1958
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Pellet Production in Thailand
    Saosee, Piyarath
    Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of green hydrogen production through electrolysis: A literature review
    Ajeeb, Wagd
    Costa Neto, Rui
    Baptista, Patricia
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2024, 69
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from wood sawdust
    Alizadeh, Peyman
    Mupondwa, Edmund
    Tabil, Lope G.
    Li, Xue
    Cree, Duncan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 427
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of paper production from treated wood
    M'hamdi, Asmae Ismaili
    Kandri, Noureddine Idrissi
    Zerouale, Abdelaziz
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Gusca, Julija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES (CONECT 2017), 2017, 128 : 461 - 468
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of wood-based panels: A review
    Costa, Daniele
    Serra, João
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Dias, Ana Cláudia
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 444