Survival Analysis and Failure Modes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cemented Semi-Retentive Acetabular Cup

被引:0
|
作者
Stan, Gabriel [1 ]
Roman, Mihai Dan [2 ]
Orban, Horia [1 ]
Georgeanu, Vlad Alexandru [1 ]
Deculescu, Rares Stefan [1 ]
Brinduse, Lacramioara Aurelia [1 ]
Gheorghiu, Nicolae [1 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Fac Med, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Univ Lucian Blaga Sibiu, Fac Med, Sibiu 550024, Romania
关键词
constrained; dislocation; failure; survival; total hip arthroplasty; FEMORAL-HEAD SIZE; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; DISLOCATION; REVISION; SURVIVORSHIP; COMPONENTS; LINER; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12247506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To reduce the incidence of total hip revisions, there have been continuous efforts to enhance prosthetic materials and designs to optimize implant survival. A primary implant with a constrained acetabular component is often used to minimize the risk of dislocations even though this approach has some drawbacks as reported in the literature. To address these concerns, this study aimed to assess the survivorship and dislocation rate of a semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup when used as a primary implant. The specific cemented cup that we studied was not present in any study that we consulted, so to fill this gap, we conducted a retrospective examination of 527 cemented hip prostheses that utilized the semi-retentive cup between the years 2005 and 2012. We employed Cox multiple regression models for our statistical analysis. The revision due to dislocation occurred in 12.8% of all cases, with a lower incidence of 5% (14 cases) in age groups >70 years than in age groups <70 years (14%-32 cases) (p < 0.001). The survival rates of the semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup were 98.6% (520 cases) at 5 years and 92.2% (487 cases) at 10 years. The survival rates were significantly lower in women than men, with 1.9% (7 cases) toward 0% at 5 years and 8.1% (30 cases) toward 5% (7 cases) at 10 years (p = 0.002). The difference in failure rates between age groups over 70 years (2.3%-10 cases) and age groups under 70 years (11.5%-34 cases) was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). Our study indicates that the semi-constrained design may cause frequent damage to the polyethylene liner due to impingement and wear, which are the primary factors for failure. Also, this implant has a similar risk of revision due to dislocation as reported in studies and may be beneficial as a primary implant in elderly patients with low-demanding lifestyles, muscular insufficiency, and low compliance regarding hip prosthetic behavior, without a major effect on survivorship.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACETABULAR CUP FAILURE AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT
    HARLEY, JM
    BOSTON, DA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1985, 67 (02): : 222 - 224
  • [32] The use of a “rim cutter” device and a flanged cup for improving the mantle of the acetabular component of a cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty
    Fernández-Valencia J.Á.
    Gallart X.
    Bori G.
    Rodríguez-Roiz J.M.
    Combalia A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (8) : 891 - 894
  • [33] Reduced survival for uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fractures
    Clarke-Jenssen, John
    Westberg, Marianne
    Roise, Olav
    Storeggen, Stein Arne Ovre
    Bere, Tone
    Silberg, Ingunn
    Madsen, Jan Erik
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (11): : 2534 - 2539
  • [34] The Lefèvre retentive cup compared with the dual mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision for dislocation
    Julien Labban
    Hoël Letissier
    Patrice Mertl
    Christian Lefèvre
    Henri Migaud
    Arnaud Clavé
    International Orthopaedics, 2020, 44 : 1661 - 1667
  • [35] Acetabular revision of total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit dual mobility cup
    Massin, P.
    Besnier, L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [36] Matched-pair analysis of cemented and cementless acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Clohisy, JC
    Harris, WH
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (06): : 697 - 705
  • [37] Total hip arthroplasty for crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip using a dual mobility acetabular cup
    Ukaj, Skender
    Krasniqi, Shaip
    Ukaj, Dren
    Dervishaj, Fatime
    Dyla, Dea
    Mucaj, Sefedin
    Tahirbegolli, Bernard
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [38] Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis
    Ho-Rim Choi
    David Anderson
    Scott Foster
    Matthew Beal
    Jo Ann Lee
    Christopher Barr
    Henrik Malchau
    Joseph McCarthy
    Young-Min Kwon
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 1905 - 1910
  • [39] Acetabular component orientation as an indicator of implant luxation in cemented total hip arthroplasty
    Cross, AR
    Newell, SM
    Chambers, JN
    Shultz, KB
    Kubilis, PS
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2000, 29 (06) : 517 - 523
  • [40] The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Maggs, J. L.
    Smeatham, A.
    Whitehouse, S. L.
    Charity, J.
    Timperley, A. J.
    Gie, G. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (03): : 307 - 312