Survival Analysis and Failure Modes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cemented Semi-Retentive Acetabular Cup

被引:0
|
作者
Stan, Gabriel [1 ]
Roman, Mihai Dan [2 ]
Orban, Horia [1 ]
Georgeanu, Vlad Alexandru [1 ]
Deculescu, Rares Stefan [1 ]
Brinduse, Lacramioara Aurelia [1 ]
Gheorghiu, Nicolae [1 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Fac Med, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Univ Lucian Blaga Sibiu, Fac Med, Sibiu 550024, Romania
关键词
constrained; dislocation; failure; survival; total hip arthroplasty; FEMORAL-HEAD SIZE; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; DISLOCATION; REVISION; SURVIVORSHIP; COMPONENTS; LINER; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12247506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To reduce the incidence of total hip revisions, there have been continuous efforts to enhance prosthetic materials and designs to optimize implant survival. A primary implant with a constrained acetabular component is often used to minimize the risk of dislocations even though this approach has some drawbacks as reported in the literature. To address these concerns, this study aimed to assess the survivorship and dislocation rate of a semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup when used as a primary implant. The specific cemented cup that we studied was not present in any study that we consulted, so to fill this gap, we conducted a retrospective examination of 527 cemented hip prostheses that utilized the semi-retentive cup between the years 2005 and 2012. We employed Cox multiple regression models for our statistical analysis. The revision due to dislocation occurred in 12.8% of all cases, with a lower incidence of 5% (14 cases) in age groups >70 years than in age groups <70 years (14%-32 cases) (p < 0.001). The survival rates of the semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup were 98.6% (520 cases) at 5 years and 92.2% (487 cases) at 10 years. The survival rates were significantly lower in women than men, with 1.9% (7 cases) toward 0% at 5 years and 8.1% (30 cases) toward 5% (7 cases) at 10 years (p = 0.002). The difference in failure rates between age groups over 70 years (2.3%-10 cases) and age groups under 70 years (11.5%-34 cases) was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). Our study indicates that the semi-constrained design may cause frequent damage to the polyethylene liner due to impingement and wear, which are the primary factors for failure. Also, this implant has a similar risk of revision due to dislocation as reported in studies and may be beneficial as a primary implant in elderly patients with low-demanding lifestyles, muscular insufficiency, and low compliance regarding hip prosthetic behavior, without a major effect on survivorship.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup: Factors affecting survival with emphasis on the integrated polyethylene spacer - An analysis of the effect of cement spacers, cement mantle thickness, and acetabular angle on the survival of total hip arthroplasty
    Faris, PM
    Ritter, MA
    Keating, EM
    Thong, AE
    Davis, KE
    Meding, JB
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (02): : 191 - 198
  • [22] Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty
    Del Schutte, H
    Lipman, AJ
    Bannar, SM
    Livermore, JT
    Ilstrup, D
    Morrey, BF
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (06): : 621 - 626
  • [23] Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty
    Elson, Leah
    Dounchis, Jon
    Illgen, Richard
    Marchand, Robert C.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    Bragdon, Charles R.
    Malchau, Henrik
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (06) : 531 - 536
  • [24] Oblong Acetabular Cup, Type TC, for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Trc, T.
    Stastny, E.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2012, 79 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [25] Definition and determination of acetabular component orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty
    Cross, AR
    Newell, SM
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2000, 29 (06) : 507 - 516
  • [26] Dual mobility acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty: use with caution
    Vahedi, Hamed
    Makhdom, Asim M.
    Parvizi, Javad
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2017, 14 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [27] Research Synthesis of Recommended Acetabular Cup Orientations for Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Harrison, Claire L.
    Thomson, Avril I.
    Cutts, Steven
    Rowe, Philip J.
    Riches, Philip E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (02): : 377 - 382
  • [28] Biomechanical Evaluation of Acetabular Cup Implantation in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Margalit, Kate A.
    Hayashi, Kei
    Jackson, Josh
    Kim, Sun Young
    Garcia, Tanya C.
    Wiggans, K. Tomo
    Aiken, Sean
    Stover, Susan M.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2010, 39 (07) : 818 - 823
  • [29] Acetabular Cup Design Influences Deformational Response in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Meding, John B.
    Small, Scott R.
    Jones, Mary E.
    Berend, Michael E.
    Ritter, Merrill A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (02) : 403 - 409
  • [30] ACETABULAR CUP-SITING DEVICE FOR TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    DOYLE, J
    MURRAY, P
    MAHONY, PO
    FARMER, M
    HOOPER, AC
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1989, 108 (05) : 317 - 321