induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management - Randomised control trial

被引:0
|
作者
Bondada, Charishma [1 ]
Sethi, Pruthwiraj [1 ]
Singh, Sweta [1 ]
Mohanty, Pankaj Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
PP.0100
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 84
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
    Helen Elden
    Henrik Hagberg
    Anna Wessberg
    Verena Sengpiel
    Andreas Herbst
    Maria Bullarbo
    Christina Bergh
    Kristian Bolin
    Snezana Malbasic
    Sissel Saltvedt
    Olof Stephansson
    Anna-Karin Wikström
    Lars Ladfors
    Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [22] Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
    Elden, Helen
    Hagberg, Henrik
    Wessberg, Anna
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Herbst, Andreas
    Bullarbo, Maria
    Bergh, Christina
    Bolin, Kristian
    Malbasic, Snezana
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Stephansson, Olof
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Ladfors, Lars
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [23] Outcome of induction of labor versus expectant management among obese women at or after 39 weeks
    Palatnik, Anna
    Kominiarek, Michelle
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S69 - S70
  • [24] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management until week 40
    Zhou, Clarice G.
    Frank, Zoe C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S359 - S360
  • [25] Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks
    Palatnik, Anna
    Kominiarek, Michelle A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (07) : 695 - 707
  • [26] Active versus expectant management of third stage of labour: the Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial
    Rogers, J
    Wood, J
    McCandlish, R
    Ayers, S
    Truesdale, A
    Elbourne, D
    LANCET, 1998, 351 (9104): : 693 - 699
  • [27] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF INDUCTION AT 42 WEEKS GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT FOR POSTDATES PREGNANCIES
    WITTER, FR
    WEITZ, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 4 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [28] Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks in obstetrical low risk women (the INDEX trial)
    Bruinsma, A.
    Keulen, J.
    Kortekaas, J.
    van Dillen, J.
    Oudijk, M.
    Bakker, J.
    van Kaam, A.
    Vandenbussche, F.
    van de Post, J.
    Mol, B. W.
    de Miranda, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 15 - 15
  • [29] Randomised trial of outpatient induction of labor with vaginal PGE(2) at 40-41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management
    Ohel, G
    Rahav, D
    Rothbart, H
    Ruach, M
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1996, 258 (03) : 109 - 112
  • [30] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S21 - S22