induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management - Randomised control trial

被引：0
|
作者：
Bondada, Charishma [1 ]
Sethi, Pruthwiraj [1 ]
Singh, Sweta [1 ]
Mohanty, Pankaj Kumar [1 ]
机构：
[1] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India
来源：
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2023年 / 130卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
PP.0100
引用
收藏
页码：84 / 84
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Medical resource use in 39 weeks elective induction versus expectant management: stratified by bishop score
    Costantine, Maged M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S151 - S151
  • [32] Maternal and perinatal outcome of induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in labor after cesarean section
    Meyer, Raanan
    Levin, Gabriel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (02) : 480 - 486
  • [33] Pregnant women's willingness to participate in a randomized trial comparing induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management: A survey in the Netherlands
    Croll, Dorothee M. R.
    Meuleman, Tessa
    de Heus, Roel
    Boer, Marjon A. de
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 273 : 7 - 11
  • [34] Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial)
    van der Ham D.P.
    Nijhuis J.G.
    Mol B.W.J.
    van Beek J.J.
    Opmeer B.C.
    Bijlenga D.
    Groenewout M.
    Arabin B.
    Bloemenkamp K.W.M.
    van Wijngaarden W.J.
    Wouters M.G.A.J.
    Pernet P.J.M.
    Porath M.M.
    Molkenboer J.F.M.
    Derks J.B.
    Kars M.M.
    Scheepers H.C.J.
    Weinans M.J.N.
    Woiski M.D.
    Wildschut H.I.J.
    Willekes C.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7 (1)
  • [35] Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term (The Digitat Trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Boers, Kim
    Vijgen, Sylvia
    Bijlenga, Denise
    Van Der Post, Joris
    Bekedam, Dick
    Kwee, Anneke
    Van Der Salm, Paulien
    Van Pampus, Marielle
    Spaanderman, Marc
    De Boer, Karin
    Duvekot, Hans
    Bremer, Henk
    Hasaart, Tom
    Delemarre, Friso
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    Van Meir, Claudia
    Willekes, Christine
    Wijnen, Ella
    Rijken, Monique
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Roumen, Frans
    Van Lith, Jan
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Scherjon, Sicco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S3 - S3
  • [36] Maternal Outcomes Associated With Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management
    Rossi, Jordan
    Contag, Stephen
    Burn, Sabrina
    Diaz, Maria
    Yao, Ruofan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 111S - 112S
  • [37] Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: protocol for a multicentre prospective, randomised controlled trial
    Walker, K. F.
    Bugg, G.
    Macpherson, M.
    McCormick, C.
    Wildsmith, C.
    Smith, G.
    Thornton, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 495 - 495
  • [38] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management by age
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S474 - S474
  • [39] Factors associated with adverse outcomes in nulliparas at 39 weeks with induction or expectant management
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S20 - S20
  • [40] Study on induction of labour versus expectant management in gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia after 36 weeks of gestation
    Majeed, A.
    Kundu, S.
    Singh, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 118 - 118
12345