Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks

被引:13
|
作者
Palatnik, Anna [1 ]
Kominiarek, Michelle A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
obesity; induction of labor; cesarean delivery; parity; BODY-MASS INDEX; MATERNAL OBESITY; CESAREAN DELIVERY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-1688471
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Maternal obesity is associated with many adverse obstetric outcomes including cesarean delivery. It is unclear whether induction of labor can reduce these risks. Previous studies report conflicting results on the outcomes of elective induction of labor among obese women. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and those undergoing expectant management at >= 39 weeks. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor of obese women (defined by prepregnancy body mass index >= 30kg/m (2) ) with singleton gestations at >= 39 weeks without medical comorbidities from 2002 through 2008. Women scheduled for medically indicated induction of labor were excluded. The primary outcome of cesarean delivery was compared between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and expectant management during 39th, 40th, and 41st weeks using univariable and multivariable analyses, stratifying by parity. Results In all, 7,298 nulliparous and 9,789 parous women were eligible for analysis. After controlling for potential confounders, elective induction of labor during 39th week in nulliparous and parous women was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (39.1 vs. 41.6%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.74 for nulliparous and 5.5 vs. 10.1%, adjusted OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.61 for parous women) compared with expectant management. Elective induction of labor during 40th and 41st weeks was not associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery. In addition, macrosomia was reduced in nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor during the 40th week (12.1 vs. 18.5%, adjusted OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.87) and in parous women undergoing elective induction of labor during 39th (11.6 vs. 17.6%, adjusted OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66) and 40th weeks (16.4 vs. 22.2%, adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.78). Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, when compared with expectant management, was associated with lower cesarean deliveries in obese nulliparous and parous women.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 707
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of induction of labor versus expectant management among obese women at or after 39 weeks
    Palatnik, Anna
    Kominiarek, Michelle
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S69 - S70
  • [2] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 38 weeks versus expectant management until week 39
    Zhou, Clarice G.
    Frank, Zoe C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S456 - S457
  • [3] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management by age
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S474 - S474
  • [4] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tita, Alan T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S21 - S22
  • [5] Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06): : 1258 - 1264
  • [6] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 40 weeks versus expectant management at community hospitals
    Frank, Zoe C.
    Caughey, Aaron
    Zhou, Clarice G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S269 - S270
  • [7] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management in Women With Prior Cesarean Delivery
    Shepherd, Megan C.
    Lee, Alan
    Olson, Gayle
    Saad, Antonio
    Saade, George R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [8] Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies
    Lewis, Susan
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Schorn, Mavis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [10] Personalized counseling regarding induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks
    Silver, Robert M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S519 - S519