Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks

被引:13
|
作者
Palatnik, Anna [1 ]
Kominiarek, Michelle A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
obesity; induction of labor; cesarean delivery; parity; BODY-MASS INDEX; MATERNAL OBESITY; CESAREAN DELIVERY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-1688471
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Maternal obesity is associated with many adverse obstetric outcomes including cesarean delivery. It is unclear whether induction of labor can reduce these risks. Previous studies report conflicting results on the outcomes of elective induction of labor among obese women. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and those undergoing expectant management at >= 39 weeks. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor of obese women (defined by prepregnancy body mass index >= 30kg/m (2) ) with singleton gestations at >= 39 weeks without medical comorbidities from 2002 through 2008. Women scheduled for medically indicated induction of labor were excluded. The primary outcome of cesarean delivery was compared between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and expectant management during 39th, 40th, and 41st weeks using univariable and multivariable analyses, stratifying by parity. Results In all, 7,298 nulliparous and 9,789 parous women were eligible for analysis. After controlling for potential confounders, elective induction of labor during 39th week in nulliparous and parous women was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (39.1 vs. 41.6%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.74 for nulliparous and 5.5 vs. 10.1%, adjusted OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.61 for parous women) compared with expectant management. Elective induction of labor during 40th and 41st weeks was not associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery. In addition, macrosomia was reduced in nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor during the 40th week (12.1 vs. 18.5%, adjusted OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.87) and in parous women undergoing elective induction of labor during 39th (11.6 vs. 17.6%, adjusted OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66) and 40th weeks (16.4 vs. 22.2%, adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.78). Conclusion Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, when compared with expectant management, was associated with lower cesarean deliveries in obese nulliparous and parous women.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 707
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resource utilization among low-risk nulliparas randomized to elective induction at 39 weeks or expectant management
    Grobman, William A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S2 - S3
  • [32] Induction of labor versus expectant management for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks
    Daskalakis, George
    Zacharakis, Dimitrios
    Simou, Maria
    Pappa, Peny
    Detorakis, Stelios
    Mesogitis, Spyros
    Antsaklis, Aris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (02): : 173 - 176
  • [33] Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women
    Einerson, Brett D.
    Nelson, Richard E.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Esplin, M. Sean
    Branch, D. Ware
    Metz, Torri D.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Varner, Michael
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [34] Induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk obese women: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
    Krogh, Lise Qvirin
    Boie, Sidsel
    Henriksen, Tine Brink
    Thornton, Jim
    Fuglsang, Jens
    Glavind, Julie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [35] Pregnant women's willingness to participate in a randomized trial comparing induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management: A survey in the Netherlands
    Croll, Dorothee M. R.
    Meuleman, Tessa
    de Heus, Roel
    Boer, Marjon A. de
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 273 : 7 - 11
  • [37] Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Skeith, Ashley E.
    Sargent, James A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (06) : 590.e1 - 590.e10
  • [38] Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation Reply
    Silver, Robert M.
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    Grobman, William A.
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    Saade, George R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 373 - 374
  • [39] induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management - Randomised control trial
    Bondada, Charishma
    Sethi, Pruthwiraj
    Singh, Sweta
    Mohanty, Pankaj Kumar
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 84 - 84
  • [40] induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management - Randomised control trial
    Bondada, Charishma
    Sethi, Pruthwiraj
    Singh, Sweta
    Mohanty, Pankaj Kumar
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 84 - 84