Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon

被引:1
|
作者
Hagens, Eliza R. C. [1 ]
Cui, Nanke [1 ]
van Dieren, Susan [1 ]
Eshuis, Wietse J. [1 ]
Lameris, Wytze [1 ]
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. [1 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAJOR PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundNumerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.MethodsPatients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.ResultsOverall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRI(events) and IDIevents, and positive percentages of cfNRI(nonevents) and IDIevents. This indicates that in the group of patients with postoperative complications, the prediction model performed better, whereas in the group of patients without postoperative complications, the surgeons performed better. NRIoverall was 18% for one surgeon, while the remainder of the NRIoverall, cfNRI(overall) and IDIoverall scores showed small differences between surgeons and the prediction models.ConclusionPrediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:5159 / 5169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] QUALITY ASSURANCE BY PREOPERATIVE RISK STRATIFICATION
    HALJAMAE, H
    HALLENBERG, B
    JIVEGARD, L
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 : 142 - 145
  • [42] Deep Learning Preoperative Risk Stratification
    Ouyang, David, V
    Hiesinger, William
    Langlotz, Curtis
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (01): : 264 - 265
  • [43] Postoperative Complications - Preoperative Risk Stratification
    不详
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2016, 141 (04): : 359 - 359
  • [44] COLORECTAL PREOPERATIVE SURGICAL SCORE: VALIDATING A PREOPERATIVE RISK STRATIFICATION MODEL FOR MAJOR COLORECTAL SURGERY
    Kong, C.
    Guest, G.
    Chan, S.
    Watters, D.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (04) : E87 - E88
  • [45] There’s Risk, and Then There’s RISK: The Latest Clinical Prognostic Risk Stratification Models in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
    Amer M. Zeidan
    Rami S. Komrokji
    Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2013, 8 : 351 - 360
  • [46] There's Risk, and Then There's RISK: The Latest Clinical Prognostic Risk Stratification Models in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
    Zeidan, Amer M.
    Komrokji, Rami S.
    CURRENT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY REPORTS, 2013, 8 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [47] Preoperative risk stratification models after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A multi-center study
    Yamane, Hiroshi
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Honda, Masashi
    Muraoka, Kuniyasu
    Oono, Hirofumi
    Isoyama, Tadahiro
    Ono, Koji
    Sejima, Takehiro
    Kadowaki, Hiroyuki
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024,
  • [48] Comparing Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Models
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Mai, Phuong L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10) : 665 - U10
  • [49] Development and Validation of Multiparametric MRI-based Radiomics Models for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer
    Lefebvre, Thierry L.
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Dohan, Anthony
    Chatterjee, Avishek
    Vallieres, Martin
    Winter-Reinhold, Eric
    Saif, Sameh
    Levesque, Ives R.
    Zeng, Xing Ziggy
    Forghani, Reza
    Seuntjens, Jan
    Soyer, Philippe
    Savadjiev, Peter
    Reinhold, Caroline
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (02) : 375 - 386
  • [50] Pretreatment Circulating Tumor DNA for Risk Stratification of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Surgery
    Azad, T. D.
    Chaudhuri, A. A.
    Newman, A.
    Stehr, H.
    Schroers-Martin, J.
    Chabon, J. J.
    Fang, P., Sr.
    Qiao, Y.
    Liao, Z.
    Komaki, R. U.
    Alizadeh, A. A.
    Lin, S. H.
    Diehn, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S90 - S91