Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon

被引:1
|
作者
Hagens, Eliza R. C. [1 ]
Cui, Nanke [1 ]
van Dieren, Susan [1 ]
Eshuis, Wietse J. [1 ]
Lameris, Wytze [1 ]
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. [1 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAJOR PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundNumerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.MethodsPatients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.ResultsOverall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRI(events) and IDIevents, and positive percentages of cfNRI(nonevents) and IDIevents. This indicates that in the group of patients with postoperative complications, the prediction model performed better, whereas in the group of patients without postoperative complications, the surgeons performed better. NRIoverall was 18% for one surgeon, while the remainder of the NRIoverall, cfNRI(overall) and IDIoverall scores showed small differences between surgeons and the prediction models.ConclusionPrediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:5159 / 5169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NEW ZEALAND CATARACT RISK STRATIFICATION (NZCRS): A PREOPERATIVE RISK STRATIFICATION SYSTEM FOR REDUCING COMPLICATIONS IN PHACOEMULSIFICATION CATARACT SURGERY
    Han, Jina V.
    Patel, Dipika V.
    Kim, Bia Z.
    Wallace, Henry B.
    McGheel, Charles N. J.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 45 : 42 - 42
  • [32] Surgical risk stratification based on preoperative risk factors in severe pediatric spinal deformity surgery
    Boachie-Adjei O.
    Yagi M.
    Sacramento-Dominguez C.
    Akoto H.
    Cunningham M.E.
    Gupta M.
    Hess W.F.
    Lonner B.S.
    Ayamga J.
    Papadopoulus E.
    Sanchez-Perez-Grueso F.
    Pelise F.
    Paonessa K.J.
    Kim H.J.
    Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (5) : 340 - 349
  • [33] What is the utility of preoperative frailty assessment for risk stratification in cardiac surgery?
    Bagnall, Nigel Mark
    Faiz, Omar
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 17 (02) : 398 - 402
  • [34] Preoperative Risk Stratification for Mortality and Major Morbidity in Major Colorectal Surgery
    Ragg, Joseph L.
    Watters, David A.
    Guest, Glenn D.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (07) : 1296 - 1303
  • [35] Preoperative risk stratification and postoperative management in elderly cancer patients
    Schmidt, M.
    Breuer, J. -P.
    Ramme, A.
    Miescke, K.
    Spies, C.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2009, 72 : S11 - S11
  • [36] THE ROLE OF PREOPERATIVE MR IMAGING FOR RISK STRATIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Lee, C.
    Yoon, J. H.
    You, D.
    Jeong, I. G.
    Song, C.
    Hong, J. H.
    Ahn, H.
    Kim, C. S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 271 - 272
  • [37] Preoperative Risk-Stratification of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis
    Chys, Brecht
    Devos, Gaetan
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Albersen, Maarten
    Moris, Lisa
    Claessens, Frank
    De Meerleer, Gert
    Haustermans, Karin
    Briganti, Alberto
    Chlosta, Piotr
    Gontero, Paolo
    Graefen, Markus
    Gratzke, Christian
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Kneitz, Burkhard
    Marchioro, Giansilvio
    Salas, Rafael Sanchez
    Spahn, Martin
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Van Der Poel, Henk
    Walz, Jochen
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Joniau, Steven
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [38] Risk stratification for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Are we comparing apples with oranges?
    Wilcox, S. W.
    Silva, T. De Campos
    Wu, B.
    Aherne, N. J.
    Shakespeare, T. P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S116 - S116
  • [39] Morphomic analysis as an aid for preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing major head and neck cancer surgery
    Rinkinen, Jacob
    Agarwal, Shailesh
    Beauregard, Jeff
    Aliu, Oluseyi
    Benedict, Matthew
    Buchman, Steven R.
    Wang, Stewart C.
    Levi, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 194 (01) : 177 - 184
  • [40] Preoperative risk stratification using electron beam computed tomography in elective vascular surgery: Relationship to clinical risk prediction and postoperative complications
    Caravalho, J
    O'Donnell, SD
    Feurstein, IM
    O'Malley, PG
    Gillespie, DL
    Goff, JM
    Sherner, J
    Van Petten, M
    Taylor, AJ
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 16 (05) : 639 - 643