Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon

被引:1
|
作者
Hagens, Eliza R. C. [1 ]
Cui, Nanke [1 ]
van Dieren, Susan [1 ]
Eshuis, Wietse J. [1 ]
Lameris, Wytze [1 ]
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. [1 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAJOR PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundNumerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.MethodsPatients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.ResultsOverall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRI(events) and IDIevents, and positive percentages of cfNRI(nonevents) and IDIevents. This indicates that in the group of patients with postoperative complications, the prediction model performed better, whereas in the group of patients without postoperative complications, the surgeons performed better. NRIoverall was 18% for one surgeon, while the remainder of the NRIoverall, cfNRI(overall) and IDIoverall scores showed small differences between surgeons and the prediction models.ConclusionPrediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.
引用
收藏
页码:5159 / 5169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applying risk assessment models in general surgery: effective risk stratification
    Samama, MM
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1999, 10 : S79 - S84
  • [22] Applying risk assessment models in orthopaedic surgery: effective risk stratification
    Cohen, AT
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1999, 10 : S63 - S70
  • [23] Systematic Review of Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score-Preoperative Risk Stratification in Bariatric Surgery
    Thomas, Harun
    Agrawal, Sanjay
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2012, 22 (07) : 1135 - 1140
  • [24] Preoperative mortality risk stratification in bariatric surgery - Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score: Systematic Review
    Aguilo, Rachel
    Thomas, Harun
    Agrawal, Sanjay
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 1 - 1
  • [25] PREOPERATIVE MORTALITY RISK STRATIFICATION IN BARIATRIC SURGERY - OBESITY SURGERY MORTALITY RISK SCORE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Aguilo, R.
    Thomas, H.
    Agrawal, S.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2012, 22 (08) : 1145 - 1145
  • [26] Preoperative renal risk stratification
    Chertow, GM
    Lazarus, JM
    Christiansen, CL
    Cook, EF
    Hammermeister, KE
    Grover, F
    Daley, J
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 95 (04) : 878 - 884
  • [27] Clinical significance of risk stratification of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery
    Wu, Ya-hua
    Lin, Ming-qiang
    Wang, Zhi-ping
    Li, Jian-cheng
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (05):
  • [28] Comparative analysis of coronary surgery risk stratification models
    Pliam, MB
    Shaw, RE
    Zapolanski, A
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 9 (03): : 203 - 222
  • [29] Strengths and Limits of Risk Stratification Models in Vascular Surgery
    Kolh, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 44 (01) : 62 - 63
  • [30] Cataract surgery risk stratification models: a systematic review
    Kang, Chaerim
    Zhu, Angela S.
    Waldman, Olivia
    Kashner, T. Michael
    Greenberg, Paul B.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025,