Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon

被引:1
|
作者
Hagens, Eliza R. C. [1 ]
Cui, Nanke [1 ]
van Dieren, Susan [1 ]
Eshuis, Wietse J. [1 ]
Lameris, Wytze [1 ]
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. [1 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MAJOR PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundNumerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.MethodsPatients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.ResultsOverall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRI(events) and IDIevents, and positive percentages of cfNRI(nonevents) and IDIevents. This indicates that in the group of patients with postoperative complications, the prediction model performed better, whereas in the group of patients without postoperative complications, the surgeons performed better. NRIoverall was 18% for one surgeon, while the remainder of the NRIoverall, cfNRI(overall) and IDIoverall scores showed small differences between surgeons and the prediction models.ConclusionPrediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:5159 / 5169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon
    Eliza R. C. Hagens
    Nanke Cui
    Susan van Dieren
    Wietse J. Eshuis
    Wytze Laméris
    Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
    Suzanne S. Gisbertz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 5159 - 5169
  • [2] ASO Visual Abstract: Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon
    Hagens, Eliza R. C.
    Cui, Nanke
    van Dieren, Susan
    Eshuis, Wietse J.
    Lameris, Wytze
    van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (8) : 5170 - 5170
  • [3] ASO Visual Abstract: Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon
    Eliza R. C. Hagens
    Nanke Cui
    Susan van Dieren
    Wietse J. Eshuis
    Wytze Laméris
    Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
    Suzanne S. Gisbertz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 5170 - 5170
  • [4] High-risk cardiac surgery: Clinical judgment prevails on risk stratification
    Mesana, Thierry
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 23 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [5] Preoperative risk and postoperative course in the surgery of esophageal cancer
    Bartels, H
    Stein, JJ
    Siewert, JR
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1996, : 326 - 327
  • [6] Comparing clinical judgment with the MySurgeryRisk algorithm for preoperative risk assessment: A pilot usability study
    Brennan, Meghan
    Puri, Sahil
    Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan
    Feng, Zheng
    Ruppert, Matthew
    Hashemighouchani, Haleh
    Momcilovic, Petar
    Li, Xiaolin
    Wang, Daisy Zhe
    Bihorac, Azra
    SURGERY, 2019, 165 (05) : 1035 - 1045
  • [7] Risk Stratification Models for Cardiac Surgery
    Granton, Jeff
    Cheng, Davy
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2008, 12 (03) : 167 - 174
  • [8] Recurrence Risk Stratification After Preoperative Chemoradiation of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Xi, Mian
    Hallemeier, Christopher L.
    Merrell, Kenneth W.
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Murphy, Mariela A. Blum
    Ho, Linus
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Mehran, Reza
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    Weston, Brian
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Lin, Steven H.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [9] Preoperative Pulmonary Risk Stratification for Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery Using Shapiro Risk Stratification Model
    Dela Cruz, B. D.
    De Leon, N. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179
  • [10] Efficacy of Preoperative Risk Stratification of Resident Phacoemulsification Surgery
    Moussa, Omar
    Frank, Tahvi
    Valenzuela, Ives
    Aliancy, Joah
    Gong, Dan
    Glass, Lora
    Winn, Bryan
    Cioffi, George
    Chen, Royce
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)