Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care-a qualitative interview study

被引:2
|
作者
Lehmann-Emele, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Jansky, Maximiliane [2 ]
Clapham, Sabina [3 ]
de Wolf-Linder, Susanne [4 ,5 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [1 ]
Hodiamont, Farina [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Georg August Univ Goettingen, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Palliat Med, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Palliat Care Outcomes Collaborat, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Nursing, Sch Hlth Sci, Winterthur, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
Specialist palliative home care; Patient-centred outcome measurement; Complexity; Qualitative research; Quality of care; Normalization process theory; Implementation; OF-LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-023-01329-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundStandardised use of patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) improves aspects of quality of care. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) considers the social (inter-)actions of implementation processes operationalised through four constructs: coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. The aim of the study was to identify barriers and enablers for the successful use of PCOMs in specialist palliative home care (SPHC) using NPT, to collect clinically meaningful and reliable data to improve patient outcomes.MethodsQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care professionals from German SPHC teams who participated in a study using PCOMs. Data were analysed using Framework analysis, and contextualised within NPT.ResultsSeventeen interviews across five teams were conducted. Some teams already had an understanding of what PCOMs are and how to use them, based on previous experience. In other teams, this understanding developed through the perception of the benefits (coherence). Participation and engagement depended on individuals and was decisive for coherence-building. The attitude of the management level also played a major role (cognitive participation). Integration of PCOMs into everyday clinical practice varied and depended on the manifestation of the first two constructs and other already established routines (collective action). In the context of appraisal, both positive (e.g. focus on patient) and negative aspects (e.g. additional work) of using PCOMs were mentioned (reflexive monitoring).ConclusionsAlthough benefits of using PCOMs were partly recognised, not all teams continued standardised use. Here, not only the social (inter-)actions, but also the influence of the context (working environment) were decisive. Future implementation strategies should consider integrating PCOMs in existing electronic patient records, education sessions supporting coherence-building, internal facilitators/local champions, and ensuring frequent data analyses as it is beneficial and increases the readiness of using PCOMs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care—a qualitative interview study
    Eva Lehmann-Emele
    Maximiliane Jansky
    Sabina Clapham
    Susanne de Wolf-Linder
    Claudia Bausewein
    Farina Hodiamont
    BMC Palliative Care, 23
  • [2] Outcome Measures of Spiritual Care in Palliative Home Care: A Qualitative Study
    Vermandere, Mieke
    De Lepeleire, Jan
    Van Mechelen, Wouter
    Warmenhoven, Franca
    Thoonsen, Bregje
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 30 (05): : 437 - 444
  • [3] Implementing a patient-centred outcome measure in daily routine in a specialist palliative care inpatient hospital unit: An observational study
    dos Santos Tavares, Alze Pereira
    Paparelli, Carolina
    Kishimoto, Carolina Sassaki
    Cortizo, Silvia Avo
    Ebina, Karen
    Braz, Mariana Sarkis
    Goncalves Mazutti, Sandra Regina
    Cristiano Arruda, Marcio Jose
    Antunes, Barbara
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [4] Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory to understand processes and context
    Bradshaw, Andy
    Santarelli, Martina
    Mulderrig, Malene
    Khamis, Assem
    Sartain, Kathryn
    Boland, Jason W.
    Bennett, Michael I.
    Johnson, Miriam
    Pearson, Mark
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 397 - 407
  • [5] Perspectives of nursing home executives on collaboration with GPs and specialist palliative care teams A qualitative interview study
    Mueller, Evelyn
    Vogel, Lena
    Nury, Edris
    Seibel, Katharina
    Becker, Gerhild
    PFLEGE, 2024, 37 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators of pharmacists' integration in a multidisciplinary home care team: a qualitative interview study based on the normalization process theory
    Bo, Karl-Erik
    Halvorsen, Kjell H.
    Le, Anna Yen-Ngoc
    Lehnbom, Elin C.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Understanding how a palliative-specific patient-reported outcome intervention works to facilitate patient-centred care in advanced heart failure: A qualitative study
    Kane, Pauline M.
    Ellis-Smith, Clare I.
    Daveson, Barbara A.
    Ryan, Karen
    Mahon, Niall G.
    McAdam, Brendan
    McQuillan, Regina
    Tracey, Cecelia
    Howley, Christine
    O'Gara, Geraldine
    Raleigh, Caroline
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Murtagh, Fliss Em
    Koffman, Jonathan
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (01) : 143 - 155
  • [8] Nurses' experiences of using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale with patients in specialized palliative care-A qualitative focus group study
    Beck, Ingela
    Toernquist, Kicki
    Gruveback, Anders
    Rasmussen, Birgit. H.
    Moller, Ulrika Olsson
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (12): : 7639 - 7649
  • [9] Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study
    Consolo, Letteria
    Basile, Ilaria
    Colombo, Stella
    Rusconi, Daniele
    Pasquot, Loredana
    Campa, Tiziana
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Lusignani, Maura
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [10] Challenges developing an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement for palliative home care: A qualitative interview and focus group study
    Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
    Bolzani, Anna
    Hriskova, Katerina
    Kolmhuber, Stefanie
    Bausewein, Claudia
    Hodiamont, Farina
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (02) : 265 - 274