Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Consolo, Letteria [1 ,2 ]
Basile, Ilaria [3 ]
Colombo, Stella [4 ]
Rusconi, Daniele [5 ]
Pasquot, Loredana [6 ]
Campa, Tiziana [3 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [3 ,6 ]
Lusignani, Maura [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Bachelor Sch Nursing, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, High Complex Unit Palliat Care Pain Therapy & Reha, Milan, Italy
[4] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Intens Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Urol Oncol Unit, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Palliative care; patient-reported outcome measures; terminal care; electronic health records; patient participation; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241249962
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROMs) enhance symptom management and patients' engagement in palliative cancer care. However, integrating them into this setting brings challenges, including patients' familiarity with technological devices and declining health status. Prioritizing the patient's acceptability and feasibility is crucial for their adoption. However, more knowledge is needed about patients' perspectives on the adoption of ePROMs in the community, especially for home-based palliative care.Aim Explore patient viewpoints on utilizing ePROMs for symptom reporting in home-based oncology palliative care.Design A qualitative interpretative approach was used to evaluate patients' points of view on using ePROMs in this specific care setting. Semistructured interviews were carried out. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis.Setting/participants A total of 25 patients receiving oncological home palliative care from the advanced palliative care unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, were invited to participate. Twenty interviews were conducted, as five patients declined due to deteriorating health.Results Four themes were identified: (1) strategic value of ePROMs and subjective appreciation; (2) enhancing patient centeredness through ePROMs; (3) exploring and addressing concerns about the use of ePROMs and (4) intersecting factors influencing the efficacy of ePROMsConclusion Despite initial reticence, home palliative care patients consider ePROMs as potentially valuable allies monitoring symptoms, enhancing their quality of life, and amplifying their voices on less explored aspects of care. Continuous dialog between healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for addressing patient skepticism about ePROMs and their impact on the human aspect of care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intelligent Palliative Care Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Sandham, Margaret H.
    Hedgecock, Emma A.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Narayanan, Ajit
    Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 747 - 757
  • [2] Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Dutton, Mary
    Walmsley-Allen, Natalie
    Slade, Anita
    McMullan, Christel
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (02) : 167 - 178
  • [3] Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient-reported outcome measures
    Jensen-Marini, Elena
    Ayton, Darshini
    Zalcberg, John
    Stirling, Robert G.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ perceptions
    Letteria Consolo
    Stella Colombo
    Ilaria Basile
    Daniele Rusconi
    Tiziana Campa
    Augusto Caraceni
    Maura Lusignani
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 22
  • [5] Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perceptions
    Consolo, Letteria
    Colombo, Stella
    Basile, Ilaria
    Rusconi, Daniele
    Campa, Tiziana
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Lusignani, Maura
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [6] Challenges developing an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement for palliative home care: A qualitative interview and focus group study
    Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
    Bolzani, Anna
    Hriskova, Katerina
    Kolmhuber, Stefanie
    Bausewein, Claudia
    Hodiamont, Farina
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (02) : 265 - 274
  • [7] Exploring patient perspectives: orthognathic surgery outcomes and experiences assessed by patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Baniulyte, Gabriele
    Esson, Michael
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (08): : 722 - 728
  • [8] Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on implementing patient-reported outcome measures in gender-affirming care: a qualitative study
    Kamran, Rakhshan
    Jackman, Liam
    Laws, Anna
    Stepney, Melissa
    Harrison, Conrad
    Jain, Abhilash
    Rodrigues, Jeremy
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [9] Barriers and Facilitators When Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at a Municipal Cancer Care Unit A Qualitative Study
    Skare, Terese S.
    Midtbust, May Helen
    Lund, Jo-asmund
    Kaasa, Stein
    Dreyer, Anne
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2023, 46 (04) : E268 - E275
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care palliative radiotherapy
    Schuler, Thilo
    Hruby, George
    Eade, Thomas
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : E10 - E11