Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Consolo, Letteria [1 ,2 ]
Basile, Ilaria [3 ]
Colombo, Stella [4 ]
Rusconi, Daniele [5 ]
Pasquot, Loredana [6 ]
Campa, Tiziana [3 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [3 ,6 ]
Lusignani, Maura [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Bachelor Sch Nursing, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, High Complex Unit Palliat Care Pain Therapy & Reha, Milan, Italy
[4] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Intens Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, Urol Oncol Unit, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Palliative care; patient-reported outcome measures; terminal care; electronic health records; patient participation; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241249962
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROMs) enhance symptom management and patients' engagement in palliative cancer care. However, integrating them into this setting brings challenges, including patients' familiarity with technological devices and declining health status. Prioritizing the patient's acceptability and feasibility is crucial for their adoption. However, more knowledge is needed about patients' perspectives on the adoption of ePROMs in the community, especially for home-based palliative care.Aim Explore patient viewpoints on utilizing ePROMs for symptom reporting in home-based oncology palliative care.Design A qualitative interpretative approach was used to evaluate patients' points of view on using ePROMs in this specific care setting. Semistructured interviews were carried out. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis.Setting/participants A total of 25 patients receiving oncological home palliative care from the advanced palliative care unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, were invited to participate. Twenty interviews were conducted, as five patients declined due to deteriorating health.Results Four themes were identified: (1) strategic value of ePROMs and subjective appreciation; (2) enhancing patient centeredness through ePROMs; (3) exploring and addressing concerns about the use of ePROMs and (4) intersecting factors influencing the efficacy of ePROMsConclusion Despite initial reticence, home palliative care patients consider ePROMs as potentially valuable allies monitoring symptoms, enhancing their quality of life, and amplifying their voices on less explored aspects of care. Continuous dialog between healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for addressing patient skepticism about ePROMs and their impact on the human aspect of care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures in skin cancer
    Black, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (06) : 1151 - 1151
  • [22] Exploring the profile of baseline patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in an outpatient oncology setting
    Webber, Kate
    Cook, Olivia
    White, Michelle
    Kwok, Alastair
    Segelov, Eva
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 200 - 201
  • [23] Feasibility and utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome measures for lung cancer in routine clinical care
    Basch, Ethan
    Lin, Huamao Mark
    Cala, Mary Lynn
    Styliadou, Melpomeni
    Galaznik, Aaron
    Wujcik, Debra
    Rusli, Emelly
    Coombs, Nicholas C.
    Beamon, Emily R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [24] Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) - ready for prime time in penile cancer care?
    Adegboye, O.
    Churchill, J.
    Moorjani, J.
    Johnson, H.
    Capper, S.
    Booker, J.
    Parnham, A.
    Lau, M.
    Sangar, V
    Faivre-Finn, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S915 - S915
  • [25] Patient experiences with patient-reported outcome measures in metastatic breast cancer trials: qualitative interviews
    Carla Romano
    Nimanee Harris
    Ari Gnanasakthy
    Denise D’Alessio
    David Chandiwana
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [26] Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study
    Philpot, Lindsey M.
    Barnes, Sunni A.
    Brown, Rachel M.
    Austin, Jessica A.
    James, Cameron S.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Ebbert, Jon O.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [27] Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures
    Campbell, Niloufar
    Ali, Faraz
    Finlay, Andrew Y.
    Salek, Sam S.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1949 - 1961
  • [28] Patient experiences with patient-reported outcome measures in metastatic breast cancer trials: qualitative interviews
    Romano, Carla
    Harris, Nimanee
    Gnanasakthy, Ari
    D'Alessio, Denise
    Chandiwana, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [29] Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures
    Niloufar Campbell
    Faraz Ali
    Andrew Y. Finlay
    Sam S. Salek
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1949 - 1961
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures
    Ribeiro, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (09) : 397 - 397