Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care-a qualitative interview study

被引:2
|
作者
Lehmann-Emele, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Jansky, Maximiliane [2 ]
Clapham, Sabina [3 ]
de Wolf-Linder, Susanne [4 ,5 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [1 ]
Hodiamont, Farina [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Georg August Univ Goettingen, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Palliat Med, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Palliat Care Outcomes Collaborat, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Nursing, Sch Hlth Sci, Winterthur, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
Specialist palliative home care; Patient-centred outcome measurement; Complexity; Qualitative research; Quality of care; Normalization process theory; Implementation; OF-LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-023-01329-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundStandardised use of patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) improves aspects of quality of care. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) considers the social (inter-)actions of implementation processes operationalised through four constructs: coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. The aim of the study was to identify barriers and enablers for the successful use of PCOMs in specialist palliative home care (SPHC) using NPT, to collect clinically meaningful and reliable data to improve patient outcomes.MethodsQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care professionals from German SPHC teams who participated in a study using PCOMs. Data were analysed using Framework analysis, and contextualised within NPT.ResultsSeventeen interviews across five teams were conducted. Some teams already had an understanding of what PCOMs are and how to use them, based on previous experience. In other teams, this understanding developed through the perception of the benefits (coherence). Participation and engagement depended on individuals and was decisive for coherence-building. The attitude of the management level also played a major role (cognitive participation). Integration of PCOMs into everyday clinical practice varied and depended on the manifestation of the first two constructs and other already established routines (collective action). In the context of appraisal, both positive (e.g. focus on patient) and negative aspects (e.g. additional work) of using PCOMs were mentioned (reflexive monitoring).ConclusionsAlthough benefits of using PCOMs were partly recognised, not all teams continued standardised use. Here, not only the social (inter-)actions, but also the influence of the context (working environment) were decisive. Future implementation strategies should consider integrating PCOMs in existing electronic patient records, education sessions supporting coherence-building, internal facilitators/local champions, and ensuring frequent data analyses as it is beneficial and increases the readiness of using PCOMs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] "Diving in the deep-end and swimming": a mixed methods study using normalization process theory to evaluate a learning collaborative approach for the implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis centers
    Holdsworth, Laura M.
    Stedman, Margaret
    Gustafsson, Erika Saliba
    Han, Jialin
    Asch, Steven M.
    Harbert, Glenda
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    Lupu, Dale E.
    Malcolm, Elizabeth
    Moss, Alvin H.
    Nicklas, Amanda
    Tamura, Manjula Kurella
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [32] Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad
    Tuersley, Lorna
    Quaye, Naa Amua
    Pisavadia, Kalpa
    Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
    Bray, Nathan
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [33] Nurse-led patient-centred intervention to increase written advance directives for outpatients in early-stage palliative care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an embedded explanatory qualitative study
    Iglesias, Katia
    Busnel, Catherine
    Dufour, Florian
    Pautex, Sophie
    Sechaud, Laurence
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [34] Understanding the challenges to implementing case management for people with dementia in primary care in England: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory
    Claire Bamford
    Marie Poole
    Katie Brittain
    Carolyn Chew-Graham
    Chris Fox
    Steve Iliffe
    Jill Manthorpe
    Louise Robinson
    BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [35] Understanding the challenges to implementing case management for people with dementia in primary care in England: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory
    Bamford, Claire
    Poole, Marie
    Brittain, Katie
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn
    Fox, Chris
    Iliffe, Steve
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Robinson, Louise
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [36] Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation: a multi-method qualitative study
    Pinto, Cathryn
    Bristowe, Katherine
    Witt, Jana
    Davies, Joanna M.
    de Wolf-Linder, Susanne
    Dawkins, Marsha
    Guo, Ping
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Daveson, Barbara
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 7 : S137 - +
  • [37] General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study
    Turner, Grace M.
    Litchfield, Ian
    Finnikin, Sam
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Calvert, Melanie
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [38] General practitioners’ views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study
    Grace M. Turner
    Ian Litchfield
    Sam Finnikin
    Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
    Melanie Calvert
    BMC Family Practice, 21
  • [39] A mixed methods multiple case study to evaluate the implementation of a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery using extended normalization process theory
    R. van Zelm
    E. Coeckelberghs
    W. Sermeus
    A. Wolthuis
    L. Bruyneel
    M. Panella
    K. Vanhaecht
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [40] A mixed methods multiple case study to evaluate the implementation of a care pathway for colorectal cancer surgery using extended normalization process theory
    van Zelm, R.
    Coeckelberghs, E.
    Sermeus, W.
    Wolthuis, A.
    Bruyneel, L.
    Panella, M.
    Vanhaecht, K.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)