Agreement between cardiac output estimation with a wireless, wearable pulse decomposition analysis device and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients

被引:4
|
作者
Khanna, Ashish K. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia, Julio O. [4 ]
Saha, Amit K. [3 ,5 ]
Harris, Lynnette [3 ,5 ]
Baruch, Martin [6 ]
Martin, R. Shayn [7 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol,Sect Crit Care Med, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Outcomes Res Consortium, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Perioperat Outcomes & Informat Collaborat POIC, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[5] Wake Forest Univ, Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[6] Caretaker Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[7] Wake Forest Univ, Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
Pulse decomposition analysis; Cardiac output; Hemodynamics; Wireless; Monitoring; Cardiac surgery; Postoperative; Intensive care unit; ACCURACY; PRESSURE; NEXFIN; CNAP;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-023-01059-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposePulse Decomposition Analysis (PDA) uses integration of the systolic area of a distally transmitted aortic pulse as well as arterial stiffness estimates to compute cardiac output. We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output (CO) estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CCO) and a wireless, wearable noninvasive device, (Vitalstream, Caretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA), that utilizes the Pulse Decomposition Analysis (CO-PDA) method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit.MethodsCO-CCO measurements were compared with post processed CO-PDA measurements in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Uncalibrated CO-PDA values were compared for accuracy with CO-CCO via a Bland-Altman analysis considering repeated measurements and a concordance analysis with a 10% exclusion zone.Results259.7 h of monitoring data from 41 patients matching 15,583 data points were analyzed. Mean CO-CCO was 5.55 L/min, while mean values for the CO-PDA were 5.73 L/min (mean of differences +- SD 0.79 & PLUSMN; 1.11 L/min; limits of agreement - 1.43 to 3.01 L/min), with a percentage error of 37.5%. CO-CCO correlation with CO-PDA was moderate (0.54) and concordance was 0.83.ConclusionCompared with the CO-CCO Swan-Ganz, cardiac output measurements obtained using the CO-PDA were not interchangeable when using a 30% threshold. These preliminary results were within the 45% limits for minimally invasive devices, and pending further robust trials, the CO-PDA offers a noninvasive, wireless solution to complement and extend hemodynamic monitoring within and outside the ICU.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement between cardiac output estimation with a wireless, wearable pulse decomposition analysis device and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients
    Ashish K. Khanna
    Julio O Garcia
    Amit K Saha
    Lynnette Harris
    Martin Baruch
    R. Shayn Martin
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2024, 38 : 139 - 146
  • [2] Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients
    Khanna, Ashish K.
    Nosow, Lillian
    Sands, Lauren
    Saha, Amit K.
    Agashe, Harshavardhan
    Harris, Lynnette
    Martin, R. Shayn
    Marchant, Bryan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2023, 37 (02) : 559 - 565
  • [3] Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients
    Ashish K. Khanna
    Lillian Nosow
    Lauren Sands
    Amit K. Saha
    Harshavardhan Agashe
    Lynnette Harris
    R. Shayn Martin
    Bryan Marchant
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2023, 37 : 559 - 565
  • [4] Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients
    Ben N Barry
    Abhiram Mallick
    Andrew R Bodenham
    Michael Vucevic
    Critical Care, 1 (2):
  • [5] Cardiac Output Estimation by Multi-Beat Analysis of Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform versus Continuous Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Post Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Khanna, Ashish K.
    Sands, Lauren E.
    Nosow, Lillian M.
    Saha, Amit
    Marchant, Bryan E.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (5S_SUPPL): : 340 - 341
  • [6] Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients
    Christopher G. Scully
    Shanti Gomatam
    Shawn Forrest
    David G. Strauss
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2016, 30 : 577 - 586
  • [7] Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients
    Scully, Christopher G.
    Gomatam, Shanti
    Forrest, Shawn
    Strauss, David G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2016, 30 (05) : 577 - 586
  • [8] Cardiac output estimation by transesophageal Doppler monitoring versus thermodilution in the intensive coronary care unit
    Mehta, A.
    Passey, R.
    Sawhney, J. P. S.
    Mantri, R. R.
    Kandpal, B.
    Jain, R.
    Dhawan, S.
    Mohanty, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 903 - 904
  • [9] Continuous cardiac output measurement:: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients
    Rödig, G
    Prasser, C
    Keyl, C
    Liebold, A
    Hobbhahn, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (04) : 525 - 530
  • [10] Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients in a paediatric intensive care unit
    R. A. Linton
    M. M. Jonas
    S. M. Tibby
    I. A. Murdoch
    T. K. O'Brien
    N. W. F. Linton
    D. M. Band
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2000, 26 : 1507 - 1511