Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

被引:13
|
作者
Wang, Simin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yuqi [3 ]
You, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Xigang [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Min [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Shaofeng [4 ]
Lynn, Henry S. [3 ]
Li, Ruimin [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Publ Hlth Safety, Dept Biostat,Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
background parenchymal enhancement; contrast-enhanced mammography; influencing factor; menstrual cycle; BREAST MRI IMPACT; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.22.28769
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) may impact contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) interpretation, although factors influencing the degree of BPE on CEM are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate relationships between clinical factors and the degree of early BPE on CEM. METHODS. This retrospective study included 207 patients (median age, 46 years) who underwent CEM between April 2020 and September 2021. Two radiologists independently assessed the degree of BPE on CEM as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked on the basis of two criteria (criterion 1, using the first of four obtained views; criterion 2, using the first two of four obtained views). The radiologists reached consensus for breast density on CEM. The EMR was reviewed for clinical factors. Radiologists' agreement for degree of BPE was assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess relationships between clinical factors and degree of BPE, treating readers' independent assessments as repeated measurements. RESULTS. Interreader agreement for degree of BPE, expressed as kappa, was 0.80 for both criteria. For both criteria, univariable analyses found degree of BPE to be negatively associated with age (both OR = 0.94), personal history of breast cancer (OR = 0.22-0.30), history of chemotherapy (OR = 0.18-0.21), history of radiation therapy (OR = 0.20-0.21), perimenopausal status (OR = 0.22-0.34), and postmenopausal status (OR = 0.10- 0.11) and to be positively associated with dense breasts (OR = 4.13-4.26) and premenopausal status with irregular menstrual cycles (OR = 7.94-14.02). Among premenopausal patients with regular menstrual cycles, degree of BPE was lowest (using postmenopausal patients as reference) for patients in menstrual cycle days 8-14 (OR = 2.56-3.30). In multivariable analysis for both criteria, the only independent predictors of degree of BPE related to menstrual status and time of menstrual cycle (e.g., using premenopausal patients in days 1-7 as reference: OR = 0.21 for both criteria for premenopausal patients in days 8-14 and OR = 0.03-0.04 for postmenopausal patients). CONCLUSION. Clinical factors, including history of breast cancer or breast cancer treatment, breast density, menstrual status, and time of menstrual cycle, are associated with degree of early BPE on CEM. In premenopausal patients, the degree of BPE is lowest on days 8-14 of the menstrual cycle. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given the potential impact of BPE on diagnostic performance, the findings have implications for CEM scheduling and interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrast-enhanced mammography: False positive result and management of additional contrast enhancement
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Neveu, Marine
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 139 - 144
  • [42] Review of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Lorente-Ramos, Rosa M.
    Azpeitia Arman, Javier
    CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (19)
  • [43] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography
    Jochelson, Maxine
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (03) : 609 - +
  • [44] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Wong, Christopher Yung Yuen
    Lee, Shu Yi Sonia
    Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 65 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [45] The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Pizzitola, Victor J.
    Lorans, Roxanne
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Appleton, Catherine M.
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 292 - 300
  • [46] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography
    Monreal, Sherri
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 89 (05) : 518 - 520
  • [47] Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Lesion Conspicuity and Size Assessment according to Background Parenchymal Enhancement
    Kim, Soo-Yeon
    Cho, Nariya
    Choi, Yunhee
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Kim, Eun Sil
    Lee, Su Hyun
    Chang, Jung Min
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (05) : 561 - 571
  • [48] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Adler, Ghazal
    Garbay, Jean Remi
    Delaloge, Suzette
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [49] Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors
    Savaridas, S. L.
    Taylor, D. B.
    Gunawardana, D.
    Phillips, M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (12) : 1085.e1 - 1085.e9
  • [50] Quantifying lesion enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: a review of published data
    Savaridas, S. L.
    Tennant, S. L.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 77 (04) : E313 - E320