Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

被引:13
|
作者
Wang, Simin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yuqi [3 ]
You, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Xigang [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Min [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Shaofeng [4 ]
Lynn, Henry S. [3 ]
Li, Ruimin [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Publ Hlth Safety, Dept Biostat,Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
background parenchymal enhancement; contrast-enhanced mammography; influencing factor; menstrual cycle; BREAST MRI IMPACT; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.22.28769
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) may impact contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) interpretation, although factors influencing the degree of BPE on CEM are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate relationships between clinical factors and the degree of early BPE on CEM. METHODS. This retrospective study included 207 patients (median age, 46 years) who underwent CEM between April 2020 and September 2021. Two radiologists independently assessed the degree of BPE on CEM as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked on the basis of two criteria (criterion 1, using the first of four obtained views; criterion 2, using the first two of four obtained views). The radiologists reached consensus for breast density on CEM. The EMR was reviewed for clinical factors. Radiologists' agreement for degree of BPE was assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess relationships between clinical factors and degree of BPE, treating readers' independent assessments as repeated measurements. RESULTS. Interreader agreement for degree of BPE, expressed as kappa, was 0.80 for both criteria. For both criteria, univariable analyses found degree of BPE to be negatively associated with age (both OR = 0.94), personal history of breast cancer (OR = 0.22-0.30), history of chemotherapy (OR = 0.18-0.21), history of radiation therapy (OR = 0.20-0.21), perimenopausal status (OR = 0.22-0.34), and postmenopausal status (OR = 0.10- 0.11) and to be positively associated with dense breasts (OR = 4.13-4.26) and premenopausal status with irregular menstrual cycles (OR = 7.94-14.02). Among premenopausal patients with regular menstrual cycles, degree of BPE was lowest (using postmenopausal patients as reference) for patients in menstrual cycle days 8-14 (OR = 2.56-3.30). In multivariable analysis for both criteria, the only independent predictors of degree of BPE related to menstrual status and time of menstrual cycle (e.g., using premenopausal patients in days 1-7 as reference: OR = 0.21 for both criteria for premenopausal patients in days 8-14 and OR = 0.03-0.04 for postmenopausal patients). CONCLUSION. Clinical factors, including history of breast cancer or breast cancer treatment, breast density, menstrual status, and time of menstrual cycle, are associated with degree of early BPE on CEM. In premenopausal patients, the degree of BPE is lowest on days 8-14 of the menstrual cycle. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given the potential impact of BPE on diagnostic performance, the findings have implications for CEM scheduling and interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
    Arefan, Dooman
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Yang, Lu
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Wu, Shandong
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 310 (01)
  • [32] Standardization of Breast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Signal with Application to the Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Rate
    Medved, Milica
    Tsuchiya, Keiko
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [33] Background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced MR imaging suggests systemic effects of intrauterine contraceptive devices
    Huck, Luisa Charlotte
    Truhn, Daniel
    Wilpert, Caroline
    Zanderigo, Eloisa
    Raaff, Vanessa
    Dethlefsen, Ebba
    Bode, Maike
    Kuhl, Christiane Katharina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (11) : 7430 - 7438
  • [34] Background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced MR imaging suggests systemic effects of intrauterine contraceptive devices
    Luisa Charlotte Huck
    Daniel Truhn
    Caroline Wilpert
    Eloisa Zanderigo
    Vanessa Raaff
    Ebba Dethlefsen
    Maike Bode
    Christiane Katharina Kuhl
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 7430 - 7438
  • [35] Background enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): are there qualitative and quantitative differences between imaging systems?
    Wessling, Daniel
    Maennlin, Simon
    Schwarz, Ricarda
    Hagen, Florian
    Brendlin, Andreas
    Olthof, Susann-Cathrin
    Hattermann, Valerie
    Gassenmaier, Sebastian
    Herrmann, Judith
    Preibsch, Heike
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04) : 2945 - 2953
  • [36] Background enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): are there qualitative and quantitative differences between imaging systems?
    Daniel Wessling
    Simon Männlin
    Ricarda Schwarz
    Florian Hagen
    Andreas Brendlin
    Susann-Cathrin Olthof
    Valerie Hattermann
    Sebastian Gassenmaier
    Judith Herrmann
    Heike Preibsch
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 2945 - 2953
  • [37] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Clinical impact for the surgeon
    Defta, Diana
    Crouzet, Agathe
    Georgescu, Dragos
    Quieffin, Farzaneh
    Callonnec, Francoise
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 115 - 124
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience
    Jong, RA
    Yaffe, MJ
    Skarpathiotakis, M
    Shumak, RS
    Danjoux, NM
    Gunesekara, A
    Plewes, DB
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) : 842 - 850
  • [39] Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced mammography: A literature review
    Travieso-Aja, Maria del Mar
    Perez-Luzardo, Octavio
    REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2022, 35 (04): : 293 - 304
  • [40] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508