Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

被引:13
|
作者
Wang, Simin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yuqi [3 ]
You, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Xigang [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Min [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Shaofeng [4 ]
Lynn, Henry S. [3 ]
Li, Ruimin [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Publ Hlth Safety, Dept Biostat,Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
background parenchymal enhancement; contrast-enhanced mammography; influencing factor; menstrual cycle; BREAST MRI IMPACT; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.22.28769
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) may impact contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) interpretation, although factors influencing the degree of BPE on CEM are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate relationships between clinical factors and the degree of early BPE on CEM. METHODS. This retrospective study included 207 patients (median age, 46 years) who underwent CEM between April 2020 and September 2021. Two radiologists independently assessed the degree of BPE on CEM as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked on the basis of two criteria (criterion 1, using the first of four obtained views; criterion 2, using the first two of four obtained views). The radiologists reached consensus for breast density on CEM. The EMR was reviewed for clinical factors. Radiologists' agreement for degree of BPE was assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess relationships between clinical factors and degree of BPE, treating readers' independent assessments as repeated measurements. RESULTS. Interreader agreement for degree of BPE, expressed as kappa, was 0.80 for both criteria. For both criteria, univariable analyses found degree of BPE to be negatively associated with age (both OR = 0.94), personal history of breast cancer (OR = 0.22-0.30), history of chemotherapy (OR = 0.18-0.21), history of radiation therapy (OR = 0.20-0.21), perimenopausal status (OR = 0.22-0.34), and postmenopausal status (OR = 0.10- 0.11) and to be positively associated with dense breasts (OR = 4.13-4.26) and premenopausal status with irregular menstrual cycles (OR = 7.94-14.02). Among premenopausal patients with regular menstrual cycles, degree of BPE was lowest (using postmenopausal patients as reference) for patients in menstrual cycle days 8-14 (OR = 2.56-3.30). In multivariable analysis for both criteria, the only independent predictors of degree of BPE related to menstrual status and time of menstrual cycle (e.g., using premenopausal patients in days 1-7 as reference: OR = 0.21 for both criteria for premenopausal patients in days 8-14 and OR = 0.03-0.04 for postmenopausal patients). CONCLUSION. Clinical factors, including history of breast cancer or breast cancer treatment, breast density, menstrual status, and time of menstrual cycle, are associated with degree of early BPE on CEM. In premenopausal patients, the degree of BPE is lowest on days 8-14 of the menstrual cycle. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given the potential impact of BPE on diagnostic performance, the findings have implications for CEM scheduling and interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Karimi, Zahra
    Phillips, Jordana
    Slanetz, Priscilla
    Lotfi, Parisa
    Dialani, Vandana
    Karimova, Jane
    Mehta, Tejas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (02) : 340 - 348
  • [2] Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Images
    Wessling, Daniel
    Maennlin, Simon
    Schwarz, Ricarda
    Hagen, Florian
    Brendlin, Andreas
    Gassenmaier, Sebastian
    Preibsch, Heike
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (19)
  • [3] Understanding Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Mammography
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2025, 314 (02)
  • [4] Marked background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced mammography
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Mascarel, Anne-Margaux
    Neveu, Marine
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [5] Hormonal Regulation of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Mammography
    Nissan, Noam
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Gluskin, Jill
    Arita, Yuki
    Keating, Delia M.
    D'Alessio, Donna
    Fruchtman-Brot, Hila
    Ochoa-Albiztegui, R. Elena
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2025, 314 (02)
  • [6] Asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associated factors, diagnostic workup, and clinical outcome
    Nissan, Noam
    Gluskin, Jill
    Ochoa-Albiztegui, Rosa Elena
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (02) : 712 - 722
  • [7] Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Retrospective Study
    Xue, Jing
    Qu, Tianyun
    Li, Zhigang
    Shi, Bo
    Yang, Guang
    Rong, Xiaocui
    Li, Yazhou
    Lin, Guoquan
    Ping, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 17 : 335 - 344
  • [8] Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Retrospective Analysis and a Pictorial Review of Clinical Cases
    Meucci, Rosaria
    Pistolese, Chiara Adriana
    Perretta, Tommaso
    Vanni, Gianluca
    Beninati, Emanuela
    Di Tosto, Federica
    Serio, Maria Lina
    Caliandro, Aurelia
    Materazzo, Marco
    Pellicciaro, Marco
    Buonomo, Oreste Claudio
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (02): : 853 - 858
  • [9] Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging
    Sogani, Julie
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Kaplan, Jennifer B.
    D'Alessio, Donna
    Goldman, Debra
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [10] Deep-learning model for background parenchymal enhancement classification in contrast-enhanced mammography
    Ripaud, E.
    Jailin, C.
    Quintana, G., I
    de Carvalho, P. Milioni
    de la Rosa, R. Sanchez
    Vancamberg, L.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (11):