Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging

被引:73
|
作者
Sogani, Julie [1 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Jennifer B. [1 ]
D'Alessio, Donna [1 ]
Goldman, Debra [3 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [3 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Imaging, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROGLANDULAR TISSUE; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; CANCER RISK; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; BASE-LINE; FOLLOW-UP; IMPACT; DENSITY; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016160284
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the extent of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at contrast material-enhanced (CE) spectral mammography and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, to evaluate interreader agreement in BPE assessment, and to examine the relationships between clinical factors and BPE. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Two hundred seventy-eight women from 25 to 76 years of age with increased breast cancer risk who underwent CE spectral mammography and MR imaging for screening or staging from 2010 through 2014 were included. Three readers independently rated BPE on CE spectral mammographic and MR images with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. To assess pairwise agreement between BPE levels on CE spectral mammographic and MR images and among readers, weighted k coefficients with quadratic weights were calculated. For overall agreement, mean k values and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The univariate and multivariate associations between BPE and clinical factors were examined by using generalized estimating equations separately for CE spectral mammography and MR imaging. Results: Most women had minimal or mild BPE at both CE spectral mammography (68%-76%) and MR imaging (69%-76%). Between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging, the intrareader agreement ranged from moderate to substantial (k = 0.55-0.67). Overall agreement on BPE levels between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging and among readers was substantial (k = 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.70). With both modalities, BPE demonstrated significant association with menopausal status, prior breast radiation therapy, hormonal treatment, breast density on CE spectral mammographic images, and amount of fibroglandular tissue on MR images (P < 001 for all). Conclusion: There was substantial agreement between readers for BPE detected on CE spectral mammographic and MR images. (C) RSNA 2017
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 73
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) as a Breast Cancer Risk Factor
    Sorin, Vera
    Yagil, Yael
    Shalmon, Anat
    Gotlieb, Michael
    Faermann, Renata
    Halshtok-Neiman, Osnat
    Sklair-Levy, Miri
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (09) : 1234 - 1240
  • [2] Marked background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced mammography
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Mascarel, Anne-Margaux
    Neveu, Marine
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [3] Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Lewin, John
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (02) : 259 - +
  • [4] Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Karimi, Zahra
    Phillips, Jordana
    Slanetz, Priscilla
    Lotfi, Parisa
    Dialani, Vandana
    Karimova, Jane
    Mehta, Tejas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (02) : 340 - 348
  • [5] Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Sachiko Yuen
    Shuichi Monzawa
    Ayako Gose
    Seiji Yanai
    Yoshihiro Yata
    Hajime Matsumoto
    You Ichinose
    Takashi Tashiro
    Kazuhiko Yamagami
    Breast Cancer, 2022, 29 : 677 - 687
  • [6] Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Yuen, Sachiko
    Monzawa, Shuichi
    Gose, Ayako
    Yanai, Seiji
    Yata, Yoshihiro
    Matsumoto, Hajime
    Ichinose, You
    Tashiro, Takashi
    Yamagami, Kazuhiko
    BREAST CANCER, 2022, 29 (04) : 677 - 687
  • [7] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging
    Lancaster, Rachael B.
    Gulla, Shannon
    De Los Santos, Jennifer
    Umphrey, Heidi R.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [8] Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography does not represent an influencing factor for breast cancer A preliminary study
    Yu, Liangliang
    Wang, Yongtao
    Xing, Dong
    Gong, Peiyou
    Chen, Qianqian
    Lv, Yongbin
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (52)
  • [9] Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics
    Magni, Veronica
    Cozzi, Andrea
    Muscogiuri, Giulia
    Benedek, Adrienn
    Rossini, Gabriele
    Fanizza, Marianna
    Di Giulio, Giuseppe
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, : 1303 - 1312
  • [10] Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Longo, Valentina
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (04) : 643 - 659