Biomechanical Effect of Hybrid Dynamic Stabilization Implant on the Segmental Motion and Intradiscal Pressure in Human Lumbar Spine

被引:5
|
作者
Hsiao, Chih-Kun [1 ]
Tsai, Yi-Jung [1 ]
Yen, Cheng-Yo [2 ]
Li, Yi-Chen [2 ]
Hsiao, Hao-Yuan [2 ]
Tu, Yuan-Kun [2 ]
机构
[1] E Da Hosp, Dept Med Res, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
[2] E Da Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
来源
BIOENGINEERING-BASEL | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
dynamic stabilization systems; Dynesys-Transition-Optima; range of motion; intradiscal pressure;
D O I
10.3390/bioengineering10010031
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The hybrid dynamic stabilization system, Dynesys-Transition-Optima, represents a novel pedicle-based construct for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The theoretical advantage of this system is to stabilize the treated segment and preserve the range of motion within the adjacent segment while potentially decreasing the risk of adjacent segment disease following lumbar arthrodesis. Satisfactory short-term outcomes were previously demonstrated in the Dynesys-Transition-Optima system. However, long-term follow-up reported accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments and segmental instability above the fusion level. This study investigated the biomechanical effects of the Dynesys-Transition-Optima system on segment motion and intradiscal pressure at adjacent and implanted levels. Segmental range of motion and intradiscal pressure were evaluated under the conditions of the intact spine, with a static fixator at L4-5, and implanted with DTO at L3-4 (Dynesys fixator) and L4-5 (static fixator) by applying the loading conditions of flexion/extension (+/- 7.5 Nm) and lateral bending (+/- 7.5 Nm), with/without a follower preload of 500 N. Our results showed that the hybrid Dynesys-Transition-Optima system can significantly reduce the ROM at the fusion level (L4-L5), whereas the range of motion at the adjacent level (L3-4) significantly increased. The increase in physiological loading could be an important factor in the increment of IDP at the intervertebral discs at the lumbar spine. The Dynesys-Transition-Optima system can preserve the mobility of the stabilized segments with a lesser range of motion on the transition segment; it may help to prevent the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration. However, the current study cannot cover all the issues of adjacent segmental diseases. Future investigations of large-scale and long-term follow-ups are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical Effects of the Implant Designed for Posterior Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine (L4-L5): A Finite Element Analysis Study
    Taherzadeh, Paniz
    Kelleci, Kubra
    Ozer, Sevil
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2024, 31 (01): : 193 - 199
  • [32] The effect of non-fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine during whole-body vibration
    Fan, Wei
    Guo, Li-Xin
    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2020, 192
  • [33] Evaluation of a Hybrid Dynamic Stabilization and Fusion System in the Lumbar Spine: A 10 Year Experience
    Kashkoush, Ahmed
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Paschel, Erin
    Goldschmidt, Ezequiel
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [34] A finite element method study of the effect of vibration on the dynamic biomechanical response of the lumbar spine
    Zhu, Shuai
    Dong, RuiChun
    Liu, Zhong
    Liu, Hong
    Lu, ZhuangQi
    Guo, YunQiang
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 111
  • [35] The effect of various options for decompression of degenerated lumbar spine motion segments on the range of motion: a biomechanical in vitro study
    Lener, Sara
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Abramovic, Anto
    Kluger, Patrick
    Thome, Claudius
    Hartmann, Sebastian
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (04) : 1358 - 1366
  • [36] The effect of various options for decompression of degenerated lumbar spine motion segments on the range of motion: a biomechanical in vitro study
    Sara Lener
    Werner Schmölz
    Anto Abramovic
    Patrick Kluger
    Claudius Thomé
    Sebastian Hartmann
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 1358 - 1366
  • [37] A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine
    Keller, TS
    Colloca, CJ
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 25 (08) : 485 - 496
  • [38] Effect of Stress on Intervertebral Disc and Facet Joint of Novel Lumbar Spine Soft Implant: Biomechanical Analysis
    Chen, Hong-liang
    Guo, Kai-jin
    Yuan, Feng
    Ding, Ning
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2014, 25 (02): : 199 - 202
  • [39] Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain
    Sudo, Hideki
    Oda, Itaru
    Abumi, Kuniyoshi
    Ito, Manabu
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Minami, Akio
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 5 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [40] Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Jia-Qi
    Kwong, Wai-Hang
    Chan, Yuk-Lam
    Kawabata, Masato
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):