Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

被引:2
|
作者
Sugimura, Yukiharu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Immohr, Moritz Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mehdiani, Arash [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Boeken, Udo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aubin, Hug [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lichtenberg, Artur [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Akhyari, Payam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Res Grp Expt Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Aachen, Germany
[5] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, RWTH Univ Hosp Aachen, Aachen, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; Impella; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; postcardiotomy; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DEVICE; LIFE;
D O I
10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00076
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the strategy of an effective Impella support for better clinical outcomes in patients with a postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS).Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 31 patients with PCCS undergoing an elective open-heart surgery followed by Impella support between November 2018 and February 2022 for further analysis.Results: The preoperative Euroscore II and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction were 9.1 & PLUSMN; 10.4 and 35.7% & PLUSMN; 12.6%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 51.6% (n = 16). In survivors (n = 15), the mean Impella support time was 6.9 & PLUSMN; 3.5 days. Patients were discharged on the postoperative day 24.9 & PLUSMN; 16.4. Regarding LV remodeling, LV end-diastolic diameter was significantly decreased after Impella support (59.2 & PLUSMN; 6.0 mm vs. 54.4 & PLUSMN; 4.7 mm, p = 0.01, preoperative vs. postoperative). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable with small (CP, n = 6) or large (5.0, n = 25) Impella systems (33.3% [n = 2] vs. 56.0% [n = 14], p = 0.39). However, a lower in-hospital mortality rate was observed in the group with early initiation (i.e., intraoperative) of Impella support (n = 14) than that with delayed Impella initiation (i.e., in the postoperative course) (n = 11) (28.6% [n = 4] vs. 90.9% [n = 10], p = 0.004).Conclusions: Impella support contributes to LV remodeling in PCCS patients. In-hospital mortality was comparable in different Impella sizes and lower in early Impella initiation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ventricular unloading by Impella® support reduces pulmonary congestion in patients with cardiogenic shock
    Uwarow, Angelika
    Bueter, Sandra
    Wiora, Julian
    Haurand, Jean
    Jung, Christian
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Horn, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B213 - B213
  • [42] OUTCOMES WITH IMPELLA IN NON-AMI CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Amancherla, Kaushik
    Patel, Jay
    Haddad, Elias V.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 930 - 930
  • [43] Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes
    Abdullah, Khaled Q. A.
    Roedler, Jana, V
    Vom Dahl, Juergen
    Szendey, Istvan
    Haake, Hendrik
    Eckardt, Lars
    Topf, Albert
    Ohnewein, Bernhard
    Jirak, Peter
    Motloch, Lukas J.
    Wernly, Bernhard
    Larbig, Robert
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [44] Clinical Outcomes of Impella Microaxial Devices Used to Salvage Cardiogenic Shock as a Bridge to Durable Circulatory Support or Cardiac Transplantation
    Cheng, Richard
    Tank, Rikin
    Ramzy, Danny
    Azarbal, Babak
    Chung, Joshua
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon A.
    Moriguchi, Jaime D.
    Arabia, Francisco A.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (07) : 642 - 648
  • [45] The Physiologic Basis and Clinical Outcomes of Combined Impella and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lim, Hoong Sern
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2020, 9 (02) : 245 - 255
  • [46] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes
    Abiragi, Michael
    Singer-Englar, Tahli
    Cole, Robert M. M.
    Emerson, Dominic
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Megna, Dominick
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Kobashigawa, Jon A. A.
    Kittleson, Michelle M. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [47] Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Kanwar, M.
    Thayer, K. L.
    Garan, A.
    Hernandez-Montfort, J.
    Whitehead, E. H.
    Mahr, C.
    Sinha, S.
    Vorovich, E.
    Harwani, N. M.
    Zweck, E.
    Abraham, J.
    Burkhoff, D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S130 - S131
  • [48] Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Kanwar, Manreet
    Thayer, Katherine L.
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime
    Whitehead, Evan
    Mahr, Claudius
    Sinha, Shashank S.
    Vorovich, Esther
    Harwani, Neil M.
    Zweck, Elric
    Abraham, Jacob
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Kapur, Navin K.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [49] Clinical Outcomes of Impella Microaxillary Pumps When Used in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Bridged Successfully to Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support and Cardiac Transplantation
    Cheng, R.
    Ramzy, D.
    Azarbal, B.
    Esmailian, F.
    Geft, D.
    Chang, D. H.
    Passano, E.
    Czer, L.
    Kobashigawa, J. A.
    Moriguchi, J.
    Arabia, F.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S139 - S139
  • [50] Impact of Initial Operative Urgency on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Treated with ECMO Due to Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Ivanov, Borko
    Krasivskyi, Ihor
    Gerfer, Stephen
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Doss, Mirko
    Holzhey, David
    Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh
    Rustenbach, Christian
    Kuhn, Elmar
    Rahmanian, Parwis Baradaran
    Mader, Navid
    Djordjevic, Ilija
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):