Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

被引:2
|
作者
Sugimura, Yukiharu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Immohr, Moritz Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mehdiani, Arash [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Boeken, Udo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aubin, Hug [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lichtenberg, Artur [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Akhyari, Payam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Res Grp Expt Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Aachen, Germany
[5] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, RWTH Univ Hosp Aachen, Aachen, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; Impella; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; postcardiotomy; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DEVICE; LIFE;
D O I
10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00076
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the strategy of an effective Impella support for better clinical outcomes in patients with a postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS).Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 31 patients with PCCS undergoing an elective open-heart surgery followed by Impella support between November 2018 and February 2022 for further analysis.Results: The preoperative Euroscore II and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction were 9.1 & PLUSMN; 10.4 and 35.7% & PLUSMN; 12.6%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 51.6% (n = 16). In survivors (n = 15), the mean Impella support time was 6.9 & PLUSMN; 3.5 days. Patients were discharged on the postoperative day 24.9 & PLUSMN; 16.4. Regarding LV remodeling, LV end-diastolic diameter was significantly decreased after Impella support (59.2 & PLUSMN; 6.0 mm vs. 54.4 & PLUSMN; 4.7 mm, p = 0.01, preoperative vs. postoperative). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable with small (CP, n = 6) or large (5.0, n = 25) Impella systems (33.3% [n = 2] vs. 56.0% [n = 14], p = 0.39). However, a lower in-hospital mortality rate was observed in the group with early initiation (i.e., intraoperative) of Impella support (n = 14) than that with delayed Impella initiation (i.e., in the postoperative course) (n = 11) (28.6% [n = 4] vs. 90.9% [n = 10], p = 0.004).Conclusions: Impella support contributes to LV remodeling in PCCS patients. In-hospital mortality was comparable in different Impella sizes and lower in early Impella initiation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Sex and Timing of Impella Support in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Shah, Tayyab
    Chou, Josephine
    Grines, Cindy
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Bellumkonda, Lavanya
    Sugeng, Lissa
    Ghiu, Ioana
    Moses, Jeffrey
    O'Neill, William
    Lansky, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B78 - B79
  • [22] Clinical outcomes of hundred large Impella implantations in cardiogenic shock patients based on individual clinical scenarios
    Sugimura, Yukiharu
    Bauer, Sebastian
    Immohr, Moritz Benjamin
    Mehdiani, Arash
    Rellecke, Philipp
    Tudorache, Igor
    Horn, Patrick
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Boeken, Udo
    Aubin, Hug
    Lichtenberg, Artur
    Akhyari, Payam
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2023, 47 (12) : 1874 - 1884
  • [23] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Wang, SS
    Chen, YS
    Ko, WJ
    Chu, SH
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1996, 20 (12) : 1287 - 1291
  • [24] Outcomes With Impella 5.0 And 5.5 In Cardiogenic Shock
    Tonleu, Franck H. Azobou
    Zapata, David
    Daneshmand, Mani
    Staloch, Dustin
    Agrawal, Akanksha
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2022, 28 (05) : S72 - S72
  • [25] Improved Clinical Outcomes Associated with the Impella 5.5 Compared to the Impella 5.0 in Contemporary Cardiogenic Shock and Heart Failure Patients
    Ramzy, D.
    Soltesz, E. G.
    Silvestry, S. C.
    Hall, S. A.
    D'Alessandro., D. A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S31 - S31
  • [26] Mechanical circulatory support with the thoratec assist device in patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Korfer, R
    ElBanayosy, A
    Posival, H
    Minami, K
    Kizner, L
    Arusoglu, L
    Korner, MM
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (01): : 314 - 316
  • [27] Comparative Clinical Outcomes with the Initial Use of Impella CP versus Impella 5.0 Devices in Patients with Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Tank, Rikin
    Cheng, Richard
    Ramzy, Danny
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Arabia, Francisco
    Azarbal, Babak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B227 - B228
  • [28] Comparison of Impella and IABP Cardiac Support Systems in Patients with cardiogenic Shock
    Tanev, I.
    Dernick, G.
    Rauwolf, T.
    Schmeisser, A.
    Braun-Dullaeus, R.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2023, 118 (05)
  • [29] The Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Scholz, Peter
    Prendergast, Thomas
    Goodman, Andrew
    Lozano, Ann Marie
    Spotnitz, Alan
    Batsides, George
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (01): : 133 - 138
  • [30] Improved clinical outcomes associated with the Impella 5.5 compared to the Impella 5.0 in contemporary cardiogenic shock and heart failure patients
    Ramzy, Danny
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Silvestry, Scott
    Daneshmand, Mani
    Kanwar, Manreet
    D'Alessandro, David A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (05): : 553 - 557