Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Abdullah, Khaled Q. A. [1 ,2 ]
Roedler, Jana, V [1 ]
Vom Dahl, Juergen [1 ]
Szendey, Istvan [1 ]
Haake, Hendrik [1 ]
Eckardt, Lars [3 ]
Topf, Albert [4 ]
Ohnewein, Bernhard [4 ]
Jirak, Peter [4 ]
Motloch, Lukas J. [4 ]
Wernly, Bernhard [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Larbig, Robert [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Maria Hilf Monchengladbach, Div Cardiol, Monchengladbach, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Cardiol, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Munster, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Div Electrophysiol, Munster, Germany
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Univ Hosp Salzburg, Clin Internal Med 2, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol Perioperat Med & Intens Care Me, Salzburg, Austria
[6] Paracelsus Med Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth & Healthcare Res, Salzburg, Austria
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0247667
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock could benefit from ventricular assist device support using the Impella microaxial blood pump. However, recent studies suggested Impella not to improve outcomes. We, therefore, evaluated outcomes and predictors in a real-world scenario. Methods In this retrospective single-center trial, 125 patients suffering from cardiac arrest/cardiogenic shock between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. 93 Patients had a prior successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Associations of covariates with the primary endpoint were assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and optimal cut-offs (using Youden index) were obtained. Results Hospital mortality was high (81%). Baseline lactate was 4.7mmol/L [IQR = 7.1mmol/L]. In multivariable logistic regression, only age (aOR 1.13 95%CI 1.06-1.20; p<0.001) and lactate (aOR 1.23 95%CI 1.004-1.516; p = 0.046) were associated with hospital mortality, and the respective optimal cut-offs were > 3.3mmol/L and age > 66 years. Patients were retrospectively stratified into three risk groups: Patients aged <= 66 years and lactate <= 3.3mmol (low-risk; n = 22); patients aged > 66 years or lactate > 3.3mmol/L (medium-risk; n = 52); and patients both aged > 66 years and lactate > 3.3mmol/L (high-risk, n = 51). Risk of death increased from 41% in the low-risk group, to 79% in the medium risk group and 100% in the high-risk group. The predictive abilities of this model were high (AUC 0.84; 95% 0.77-0.92). Conclusion Mortality was high in this real-world collective of severely ill cardiogenic shock patients. Better patient selection is warranted to avoid unethical use of Impella. Age and lactate might help to improve patient selection.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Intraortic Balloon Pump Versus Impella in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Analysis
    Ranka, Sagar
    Parimi, Nikhil
    Dalia, Tarun
    Acharya, Prakash
    Taduru, Siva
    Gupta, Kamal
    Shah, Zubair
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S138 - S138
  • [2] Outcomes with Impella in Cardiogenic Shock
    Herve, Franck
    Tonleu, Azobou
    Lyle, Melissa
    Staloch, Dustin
    Sridharan, Lakshmi
    Bhatt, Kunal
    Morris, Alanna
    Burke, Michael
    Smith, Andrew
    Attia, Tamer
    Vega, John D.
    Daneshmand, Mani
    Jaber, Wissam
    Laskar, Sonjoy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S155 - S156
  • [3] Outcomes of Impella RP in Cardiogenic Shock
    Mody, K. P.
    Walters, P.
    Stewart, S. M.
    Silva, C.
    Dudiy, Y.
    Batsides, G. P.
    Anderson, M. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S466 - S466
  • [4] Secular Trend in the Use and Implementation of Impella in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Experience
    Hritani, Abdul Wahab
    Wani, Adil S.
    Olet, Susan
    Lauterbach, Claire J.
    Allaqaband, Suhail Q.
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Jan, M. Fuad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09): : E265 - E270
  • [5] The Use of the Impella Device in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, A.
    Batsides, G.
    Prendergast, T.
    Scholz, P.
    Spotnitz, A.
    Lozano, A. M.
    Lee, L. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S283 - S283
  • [6] Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock - Impella support for cardiogenic shock
    Meyns, B
    Dens, J
    Sergeant, P
    Herijgers, P
    Daenen, W
    Flameng, W
    [J]. THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2003, 51 (06): : 312 - 317
  • [7] Cangrelor Use in Cardiogenic Shock A Single-Center Real-World Experience
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Qamar, Arman
    Badreldin, Hisham A.
    Faxon, David P.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (16) : 1712 - 1714
  • [8] Outcomes With Impella 5.0 And 5.5 In Cardiogenic Shock
    Tonleu, Franck H. Azobou
    Zapata, David
    Daneshmand, Mani
    Staloch, Dustin
    Agrawal, Akanksha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2022, 28 (05) : S72 - S72
  • [9] Comparative Clinical Outcomes with the Initial Use of Impella CP versus Impella 5.0 Devices in Patients with Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Tank, Rikin
    Cheng, Richard
    Ramzy, Danny
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Arabia, Francisco
    Azarbal, Babak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B227 - B228
  • [10] Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Sugimura, Yukiharu
    Immohr, Moritz Benjamin
    Mehdiani, Arash
    Boeken, Udo
    Aubin, Hug
    Lichtenberg, Artur
    Akhyari, Payam
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 30 (01)