Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

被引:2
|
作者
Sugimura, Yukiharu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Immohr, Moritz Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mehdiani, Arash [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Boeken, Udo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aubin, Hug [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lichtenberg, Artur [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Akhyari, Payam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Med Fac, Res Grp Expt Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ Hosp, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Aachen, Germany
[5] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, RWTH Univ Hosp Aachen, Aachen, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; Impella; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; postcardiotomy; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DEVICE; LIFE;
D O I
10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00076
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the strategy of an effective Impella support for better clinical outcomes in patients with a postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS).Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 31 patients with PCCS undergoing an elective open-heart surgery followed by Impella support between November 2018 and February 2022 for further analysis.Results: The preoperative Euroscore II and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction were 9.1 & PLUSMN; 10.4 and 35.7% & PLUSMN; 12.6%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 51.6% (n = 16). In survivors (n = 15), the mean Impella support time was 6.9 & PLUSMN; 3.5 days. Patients were discharged on the postoperative day 24.9 & PLUSMN; 16.4. Regarding LV remodeling, LV end-diastolic diameter was significantly decreased after Impella support (59.2 & PLUSMN; 6.0 mm vs. 54.4 & PLUSMN; 4.7 mm, p = 0.01, preoperative vs. postoperative). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable with small (CP, n = 6) or large (5.0, n = 25) Impella systems (33.3% [n = 2] vs. 56.0% [n = 14], p = 0.39). However, a lower in-hospital mortality rate was observed in the group with early initiation (i.e., intraoperative) of Impella support (n = 14) than that with delayed Impella initiation (i.e., in the postoperative course) (n = 11) (28.6% [n = 4] vs. 90.9% [n = 10], p = 0.004).Conclusions: Impella support contributes to LV remodeling in PCCS patients. In-hospital mortality was comparable in different Impella sizes and lower in early Impella initiation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effective Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella in Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Tang, D. G.
    Vetrovec, G. W.
    Toma, C.
    Civitello, A. B.
    Silver, M.
    Anderson, M. B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S434 - S434
  • [2] The Use of the Impella Device in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, A.
    Batsides, G.
    Prendergast, T.
    Scholz, P.
    Spotnitz, A.
    Lozano, A. M.
    Lee, L. Y.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S283 - S283
  • [3] Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock - Impella support for cardiogenic shock
    Meyns, B
    Dens, J
    Sergeant, P
    Herijgers, P
    Daenen, W
    Flameng, W
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2003, 51 (06): : 312 - 317
  • [4] Outcomes after extracorporeal life support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Alvau, Francesca
    Armoiry, Xavier
    Grinberg, Daniel
    Hugon-Vallet, Elisabeth
    Koffel, Catherine
    Portran, Philippe
    Scollo, Giovanni
    Fellahi, Jean Luc
    Obadia, Jean Francois
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2019, 34 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [5] Outcomes with Impella in Cardiogenic Shock
    Herve, Franck
    Tonleu, Azobou
    Lyle, Melissa
    Staloch, Dustin
    Sridharan, Lakshmi
    Bhatt, Kunal
    Morris, Alanna
    Burke, Michael
    Smith, Andrew
    Attia, Tamer
    Vega, John D.
    Daneshmand, Mani
    Jaber, Wissam
    Laskar, Sonjoy
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S155 - S156
  • [6] Occurrence and Impact of Blood Transfusions in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Impella Support
    Peters, Elma
    Bogerd, Margriet
    Karami, Mina
    Raasveld, Jorinde
    Lagrand, Wim K.
    Vlaar, Alexander
    Henriques, Jose
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B162 - B163
  • [7] OUTCOMES OF IMPELLA 5.5 SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK IN POSTPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY
    Haci, Seline
    Sojdie, Sean
    Lima, Brian
    Wombacher, Timothy P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 911 - 911
  • [8] Concomitant ECMO And IABP Support in Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock Patients
    Djordjevic, Ilija
    Deppe, Antje-Christin
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Kuhn, Elmar
    Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh
    Merkle, Julia
    Gerfer, Stephen
    Gaisendrees, Christopher
    Ivanov, Borko
    Moellenbeck, Lukas
    Adler, Christoph
    Rustenbach, Christian
    Rahmanian, Parwis
    Mader, Navid
    Kuhn-Regnier, Ferdinand
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (10): : 1533 - 1539
  • [9] A Contemporary Report Of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Impella 5.5 In Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Riaz, Sana
    Konstantinidis, Ippokratis
    Tysarowski, Maciej
    Gluck, Jason
    Ayyazali
    Jaiswal, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2024, 30 (01) : 237 - 237
  • [10] Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock
    Mara Isabel BarrionuevoSnchez
    Albert ArizaSol
    Daniel OrtizBerbel
    Jos GonzlezCostello
    Joan Antoni GmezHospital
    Victria Lorente
    Oriol Alegre
    Isaac Lla
    Jos Carlos SnchezSalado
    Josep GmezLara
    Arnau BlascoLucas
    Josep CominColet
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2022, 19 (02) : 115 - 124