Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners

被引:28
|
作者
Monson, Keith L. [1 ]
Smith, Erich D. [1 ]
Peters, Eugene M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Bur Invest Lab, Quantico, VA 22135 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES | 2023年 / 68卷 / 01期
关键词
accuracy; black box; consecutive manufacture; decision analysis; error rate; firearms and toolmark identification; foundational validity; open set design; reliability; subclass; BLIND TESTING PROGRAM; VALIDATION; TOOL; IDENTIFICATION; DESIGN; BULLET;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.15152
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false-positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi-square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum-likelihood estimates based on the beta-binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner-specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENT EXAMINERS IN THE UNITED-STATES - A HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS
    MCCARTHY, JF
    JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1981, 21 (02): : 125 - 125
  • [42] A statistical approach to aid examiners in the forensic analysis of handwriting
    Crawford, Amy M. M.
    Ommen, Danica M. M.
    Carriquiry, Alicia L. L.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (05) : 1768 - 1779
  • [43] Multiform Korean handwriting authentication by forensic document examiners
    Kang, Tae-Yi
    Lee, Joong
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 255 : 133 - 136
  • [44] Development of a Human Trafficking Flowsheet for Clinical Forensic Examiners
    Sonsiadek, Jennifer S.
    Devore, Heather K.
    Toliver, Christine
    Yingling, Cara
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC NURSING, 2024, 20 (04) : 250 - 255
  • [45] Simulation Detection in Handwritten Documents by Forensic Document Examiners
    Kam, Moshe
    Abichandani, Pramod
    Hewett, Tom
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (04) : 936 - 941
  • [46] Medicolegal Death Investigation: Medical Examiners/Coroners, Forensic Pathology, and Collaboration with Forensic Anthropology
    Knight, Laura D.
    Pilloud, Marin A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2023, 180 : 93 - 93
  • [47] Investigation of country-made firearms in forensic relevance
    Shil, Sourav
    Dey, Dibyendu
    Singh, Thoudam Chandramani
    Dhaka, Aayush
    Pratihari, H.K.
    Datta Roy, Arpan
    Interactions, 2024, 245 (01)
  • [48] Why the post-identification era is long overdue: Commentary on the current controversy over forensic feature comparison as applied to forensic firearms examination
    Biedermann, Alex
    Champod, Christophe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF, 2025, 29 (02): : 140 - 160
  • [49] BASIC ELEMENTS OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS
    PURDY, DC
    JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1984, 24 (06): : 608 - 608
  • [50] BIAS AMONG FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS - A NEED FOR PROCEDURAL CHANGES
    MILLER, LS
    JOURNAL OF POLICE SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION, 1984, 12 (04): : 407 - 411