Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners

被引:28
|
作者
Monson, Keith L. [1 ]
Smith, Erich D. [1 ]
Peters, Eugene M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Bur Invest Lab, Quantico, VA 22135 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES | 2023年 / 68卷 / 01期
关键词
accuracy; black box; consecutive manufacture; decision analysis; error rate; firearms and toolmark identification; foundational validity; open set design; reliability; subclass; BLIND TESTING PROGRAM; VALIDATION; TOOL; IDENTIFICATION; DESIGN; BULLET;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.15152
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false-positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi-square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum-likelihood estimates based on the beta-binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner-specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The polymorphism of crime scene investigation: An exploratory analysis of the influence of crime and forensic intelligence on decisions made by crime scene examiners
    Resnikoff, Tatiana
    Ribaux, Olivier
    Baylon, Amelie
    Jendly, Manon
    Rossy, Quentin
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 257 : 425 - 434
  • [32] ACCURACY AND CONSISTENCY OF POLYGRAPH EXAMINERS DIAGNOSES
    HUNTER, FL
    ASH, P
    JOURNAL OF POLICE SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION, 1973, 1 (03): : 370 - 375
  • [33] DRUGFIRE - REVOLUTIONIZING FORENSIC FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION AND PROVIDING THE FOUNDATION FOR A NATIONAL FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION NETWORK
    SIBERT, RW
    CRIME LABORATORY DIGEST, 1994, 21 (04): : 63 - 67
  • [34] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners
    Ulery, Bradford T.
    Hicklin, R. Austin
    Buscaglia, JoAnn
    Roberts, Maria Antonia
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [35] The influence of perceived difficulty, availability of marks, and examination time on the conclusions of firearms examiners
    Monson, Keith L.
    Smith, Erich D.
    Peters, Eugene M.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2025,
  • [36] Training of Assistant Forensic Medical Examiners in London, UK
    Stark, Margaret M.
    Norfolk, Guy A.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (04) : 194 - 197
  • [37] When Forensic Examiners Disagree: Bias, or Just Inaccuracy?
    Mossman, Douglas
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2013, 19 (01) : 40 - 55
  • [38] Expertise of forensic document examiners: A signal detection analysis
    Phillips, JG
    Rogers, D
    Found, B
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 56 : 132 - 132
  • [39] The role of prior expectations in polygraph examiners decisions
    Elaad, E
    Ginton, A
    Ben-Shakhar, G
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 1998, 4 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [40] CONTINUING-EDUCATION NEEDED FOR FORENSIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS
    RIX, KJB
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6881): : 861 - 861